A Survey Based Feedback Analysis of the Current Medical Teaching Methodology and Trends in Medical Research Practice in a South Indian Medical Institute
Background: The spine of a good healthcare system is the medical education received by its doctors. As medicine is evolving, the same can be inferred regarding the delivery of medical education. This study was conducted among 541 students in a prestigious medical college in India. The aim of the study was to find out lapses in our current medical education system and steps to improve it.
Methods: A total of 541 medical students were included in this study. The only inclusion criteria being that they should be in their 2nd year MBBS or above. A questionnaire of 20 questions was given to each student and they were asked to mark the answers they felt was most appropriate. The questionnaire dealt with issues faced in our current education system regarding teaching methodology, clinical postings, research, evidence based medicine and steps to improve the healthcare system. Data was collected, analysed and statistically evaluated using Microsoft Excel and SPS version 21.0.
Results: Majority of the students felt that classroom strength should not be more than a hundred students. They felt that more innovative teaching methods and discussions should be included. Students laid emphasis on research, clinical skills training and evidence based medicine. They felt that the healthcare system also needs tweaking in terms of funding and practicing evidence based medicine to be on par with healthcare systems across the world.
Conclusion: The results in this study, resonates with the results of various other studies regarding delivery of medical education. It also takes into account the holistic approach of improving medical education and healthcare rather than focusing on one single aspect.
2. Mahler S, Neumann L, Tamir P. The class size effect upon activity and cognitive dimensions of lessons in higher education. Assess Eval High Educ. 1986 Mar 1;11(1):43-59.
3. Pal R, Kar S, Zaman FA, Jha DK, Pal S. Assessment of impact of small group teaching among students in community medicine. Indian J Community Med. 2012 Jul;37(3):170.
4. Najmi RS. Lectures as a Mode of Instruction in Undergraduate Medical Education. J Pak Med Assoc. 1999 Feb;49(2):30-3.
5. Mustafa T, Farooq Z, Asad Z, Amjad R, Badar I, Chaudhry AM, et al. Lectures in medical educaton: what students think?. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014 Jan 1;26(1):21-5.
6. Joshi A, Ganjiwale J. Evaluation of Students’ Perceptions Towards An Innovative Teaching-Learning Method During Pharmacology Revision Classes: Autobiography of Drugs. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jul;9(7):FC01-4.
7. Datta R, Datta K, Venkatesh MD. Evaluation of interactive teaching for undergraduate medical students using a classroom interactive response system in India. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015 Jul; 71(3): 239–245.
8. Zhao B, Potter DD. Comparison of lecture-based learning vs discussion-based learning in undergraduate medical students. J Surg Educ. 2016 Mar-Apr;73(2):250-7.
9. Smits PB, D de Buisonjé C, Verbeek JH, van Dijk FJ, Metz JC, Cate OJ. Problem-based learning versus lecture-based learning in postgraduate medical education. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2003 Aug;29(4):280-7.
10. Das P, Biswas S, Singh R, Mukherjee S, Ghoshal S, Pramanik D. Effectiveness of early clinical exposure in learning respiratory physiology among the newly entrant MBBS students. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2017 Jan; 5(1): 6–10.
11. McMenamin PG. Body painting as a tool in clinical anatomy teaching. Anat Sci Educ. 2008 Jul-Aug;1(4):139-44.
12. Cookson NE, Aka JJ, Finn GM. An exploration of anatomists’ views toward the use of body painting in anatomical and medical education: An international study. Anat Sci Educ. 2018 Mar;11(2):146-154.
13. Bhardwaj P, Bhardwaj N, Mahdi F, Srivastava JP, Gupta U. Integrated teaching program using case-based learning. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2015 Aug;5(Suppl 1):S24-8.
14. Arghode V, Yalvac B, Liew J. Teacher empathy and science education: A collective case study. EJMSTE. 2013;9(2):89–99.
15. Favrat B, Pecoud A, Jaussi A. Teaching cardiac auscultation to trainees in internal medicine and family practice: does it work?. BMC Med Educ. 2004 Dec;4(1):5.
16. Heckmann JG, Bleh C, Dütsch M, Lang CJ, Neundörfer B. Does improved problem-based teaching influence students’ knowledge at the end of their neurology elective? An observational study of 40 students. J Neurol. 2003 Dec 1;250(12):1464-8.
17. Zakarija-Grković I, Šimunović VJ. Introduction and preparation of an objective structured clinical examination in family medicine for undergraduate students at the University of Split. Acta Med Acad. 2012 Mar 27;41(1):68-74.
18. Kotwal A. Innovations in teaching/learning methods for medical students: Research with mentoring. Indian J Public Health. 2013 Jul 1;57(3):144.
19. Farzaneh E, Amani F, Taleghani YM, Fathi A, Kahnamouei-aghdam F, Fatthzadeh-Ardalani G. Research barriers from the viewpoint of faculty members and students of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Iran, 2014. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017 Jan 2;4(6):1926-32.
20. Ashrafi-rizi H, Fateme Z, Khorasgani ZG, Kazempour Z, Imani ST. Barriers to research activities from the perspective of the students of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Acta Inform Med. 2015 Jun;23(3):155.
21. Palmer EJ, Devitt PG. Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple-choice questions? Research paper. BMC Med Educ. 2007 Dec;7(1):49.
22. Bhatt RV, Soni JM, Patel NF, Doctor PS. Migration of Baroda medical graduates, 1949—72. Med Educ. 1976 Jul 1;10(4):290-2.
23. Coomarasamy A, Khan KS. What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence based medicine changes anything? A systematic review. BMJ. 2004 Oct 28;329(7473):1017.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Enforcement of copyright
The IJMS takes the protection of copyright very seriously.
If the IJMS discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, the IJMS may bring legal proceedings against you seeking reparation and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.
If you become aware of any use of the IJMS' copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above, please report this by email to firstname.lastname@example.org
If you become aware of any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to email@example.com