Original Article

Traumatic Brain Injury in Honduras: The Use of a Paper-based Surveillance System to Characterize Injuries Patterns


Erica Johnson1, Cristina Rodriguez2, Juan C. Puyana3, Francisco J. Bonilla-Escobar4


doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2022.1384

Volume 10, Number 4: 381-386
Received 01 02 2022; Rev-request 28 02 2022; Rev-request 15 08 2022; Rev-recd 29 03 2022; Rev-recd 25 08 2022; Accepted 07 09 2022

ABSTRACT

Background:

Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) are a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Violence is the leading cause of mortality in Honduras. However, the incidence and impact of TBI in this low-middle income country (LMIC) is unknown. The aim of this study is to describe the epidemiology of TBI in Honduras, as captured by an injury surveillance tool in the country’s major referral center.

Methods:

A cross sectional review of all TBI-related emergency department visits at the main referral hospital in Honduras from January to December 2013 was conducted. The calculation of descriptive statistics from Injury Surveillance System (InSS) data was performed.

Results:

Of 17,971 total injuries seen in 2013, 20% were traumatic brain injuries (n=3,588). The main mechanisms of injury were falls (41.11%), road traffic accidents (23.91%), blunt trauma (20.82%), penetrating knife injuries (5.85%), and firearm injuries (2.26%). Most TBI were classified as mild; 99.69% (Glasgow Coma Scale=15). Emergency room mortality was low (1.11%). The modified Kampala Trauma Score median was 8 (interquartile range 7-8).

Conclusion:

Mild TBI accounts for a significant percentage of all injuries presenting to a high-volume referral center in Honduras in 2013. Despite the high incidence of violence in this country, most TBI were accidental, secondary to road traffic accidents and falls. Further research is required with more recent data as well as with prospective data collection methods.

Keywords: Wounds and Injuries; Nervous System Trauma; Trauma Centers; Violence; Honduras; Traumatic Brain Injuries (Source: MeSH-NLM).

Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes death and significant disability worldwide.13 Estimates of the global incidence of TBI are as high as 69 million per year.4 The impact is especially high in low- and middle-income countries, where the population is at risk for injury due to epidemiological and environmental factors, and have three-times the incidence rate of high-income countries. The affected populations are often younger and live below the poverty line.5 In addition, most countries in Latin America experience high rates of road traffic collisions and exceedingly high rates of interpersonal violence.6

Results from the WHO Global Burden of Disease Study suggests that Latin American countries have the highest incidence of intracranial injury in the world.7,8 TBI age-standardized prevalence has increased from 1990 to 2016 by 8.4% and is responsible for 8.1 million years of life lived with disability. The most common causes of TBI have been reported as falls and road injuries.9 There is a need of information regarding TBI in Latin American countries to inform public health policies and implement trauma protocols to reduce this burden.10

The Central American country of Honduras, a low-middle income country (LMIC), has a high rate of violence.11 In 2014, the United Nations ranked Honduras as the world’s most violent country, with homicide rates of 85.5 per 100,000 inhabitants. Males were mainly affected (91.6%) and were most often injured with firearms (83%).12,13 Despite the high rate of violence, there are few published studies that have assessed the impact of traumatic injury in Honduras.2,14 It is difficult to obtain data on injury patterns in Honduras due to the lack of a formal trauma registry.15 Recently, an incidence of 279 TBIs and a prevalence of 567 per 100,000 inhabitants were reported in Honduras, with an increasing trend of 30% in both indicators when comparing the year 1990 to 2016.9

The Injury Surveillance System (InSS) is a paper-based injury surveillance system used to capture epidemiological data on injury-related visits to the University’s Medical School Hospital (UMSH) in Tegucigalpa, Honduras. The goal of the InSS is to measure and study injury epidemiology and trauma-related outcomes in the absence of a trauma registry. The InSS was established in 2005 through initiatives and funding from the United States Center for Disease Control (CDC), the Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO), and the United Nations Development Programe (UNDP). Paper-based trauma surveillance systems have been successfully used to collect injury data in emergency departments in other low- and middle-income countries, such as Colombia, El Salvador, Peru, and Jamaica.16 The InSS was last validated in 2013 and therefore, well suited for this study. To the best of our knowledge, there is no recent data available from any hospital-based surveillance systems on TBI in the country.

The aim of this research was to use data from the InSS to describe the patients with traumatic brain injuries, the characteristics of the injuries, and the patients’ outcomes in a major referral center in Tegucigalpa, the capital of Honduras. This research could help establish a baseline of TBI in the city, as well as provide more information on patient characteristics towards the promotion of novel assessments of this issue and future improvement of healthcare provision and prevention.

Methods

A cross-sectional review of all injury-related Emergency Department visits to the University’s Medical School Hospital (UMSH) in Tegucigalpa from January 1st, 2013 to December 31st, 2013 was conducted. The UMSH is the main referral center for 64 primary care health centers and five hospitals in the Central District of Honduras, home to 1.8 million inhabitants. The hospital recorded an estimated 87,000 patients visits a year, with approximately 15% of admissions due to trauma. Injury data from the injury surveillance system (InSS), a paper-based instrument that was first implemented in 2005 to register all injury-related visits to the UMSH emergency room, was obtained. The goal of the InSS is to obtain basic epidemiological information on traumatic injuries.1618

A hospital worker at the UMSH completed an InSS document for every patient that arrived at the Emergency Department by interviewing the patient and/or the family. The paper-based form captures demographic information (age, date of birth, and marital status), descriptions of injury mechanism, injury type and severity, and circumstances of injury. Specific information on injury intentionality, the presence of drug or alcohol use at the time of injury, and on road traffic collisions is included in the form. The InSS also includes some basic outcomes measures, such as the patient’s treatment plan, clinical evaluations, disposition, and mortality.17 This information is included in each patient’s chart and later transferred to an electronic record.18

A physician evaluated each patient at the emergency room and filled the medical, diagnosis, and treatment sections of the InSS. All patients with TBIs described in the InSS in the diagnosis section of the form were included. TBI was considered as a sudden trauma to the head that could have affected the brain, with different grades of severity from transitory symptoms such as blurry vision, confusion, and loss of consciousness to severe loss of cognitive and motor responses. Exclusion criteria included not having at least 20% of the specifications; however, all prospective subjects met the inclusion criteria and were used in this study.

For the purposes of this study, all InSS data were transferred to Stata 14® (StataCorp, TX, USA) for review and analysis. The quantitative variables were described using central tendency and dispersion measures while categorical variables were described with frequencies and percentages. Chi-squared tests were performed to compare groups for categorical variables. Injury rates per 100,000 inhabitants and 95% exact confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated based on a binomial distribution (N=8,303,771 inhabitants, National Institute of Statistics of Honduras). The mortality risk was assessed using the modified Kampala Trauma Score, a validated tool to assess injury severity. The modified Kampala Trauma Score, calculated using age, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, neurologic status, and number of injuries, is used for risk stratification of patients in resource-limited settings.22

Injuries were either classified as intentional or unintentional. Intentional injuries were either violent interpersonal injuries or self-inflicted. Unintentional injuries included both falls and road traffic collisions.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pittsburgh (PRO17080111) as a part of a wider study assessing trauma in Honduras.

Results

In 2013, a total of 17,971 patients were registered in the InSS over the period of January 1st, 2013 to December 31st, 2013, resulting in an injury rate of 216.42 per 100,000 inhabitants (95% CI: 213.27-219.60). There were 3,588 TBIs captured in the InSS, accounting for 19.97% of all injuries over the study period (3,588/17,971 injuries in 2013, Table 1). Most patients were treated and discharged on the same day of arrival (54.9%, 9,855 patients), and 44.7% of patients were hospitalized (8,021).

Table 1.

Characteristics of Traumatic Brain Injuries in Honduras, 2013.

Factor Frequency (n=3588)
Sex, n (%)
 Female 1028 (28.7%)
 Male 2554 (71.3%)
Age, median (IQR) 19 (7 – 33)
Age categories in years, n (%)
 0-17 1659 (46.4%)
 18-45 1415 (39.6%)
 46-65 322 (9.0%)
 66-95 178 (5.0%)
Pregnancy, n (%) 12 (1.2%)
TBI severity based on Glasgow coma scale, n (%)
 Mild 3582 (99.9%)
 Moderate 3 (0.1%)
 Severe 2 (0.1%)
Other affected anatomical sites, n (%)
 Eyes 46 (1.3%)
 Nose 28 (0.8%)
 Neck 22 (0.6%)
 Others 69 (1.9%)
Place of injury, n (%)
 Street 1478 (43.9%)
 Home 1255 (37.3%)
 Workplace 194 (5.8%)
 Vehicle 151 (4.5%)
 School 132 (3.9%)
 Sport arena 84 (2.5%)
 Other 74 (2.1%)
Main mechanism of injury, n (%)
 Fall 1475 (42.2%)
 Road traffic collision 858 (24.5%)
 Blunt force 747 (21.3%)
 Sharpe object injury 210 (6.0%)
 Gunshot 81 (2.3%)
 Other 128 (3.6%)
Activity, n (%)
 Recreation 1302 (40.2%)
 Traveling 1007 (31.1%)
 Working 472 (13.2%)
 Drinking alcohol 152 (4.7%)
 Working/cleaning the house 110 (3.4%)
 Practicing sport 106 (3.3%)
 Other 86 (2.4%)
Intentionality
 Unintentional 2991 (83.4%)
 Intentional 576 (16.1%)
 Self-inflicted 20 (0.6%)
Outcome at Emergency
 Discharged 1997 (55.7%)
 Hospitalized 1549 (43.2%)
 Dead 40 (1.1%)
Legend: SD: Standard deviation. GCS is categorized as mild (13–15), moderate (9–12) and severe (≤ 8). ¥ Calculated only for women (n=1,028).

Among the recorded traumatic brain injuries, 14.88% were open injuries. The male-to-female injury rate was 2:1 (Table 2). The average age of injury was 23±19 years, with the majority occurring between 0-17 years of age (46.42%, Figure 1).

Table 2.

Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Characteristics by Intention of the Injury in Honduras.

Characteristics Intentional TBI Unintentional TBI p-value
(n=576) (n=3,012)
Sex* p<0.001
 Male 485 2,069
 Female 91 937
Age* p<0.001
 0-17 years, n 96 1,563
 18-45 years, n 396 1,019
 46-98 years, n 82 418
Pregnancy p=0.291
 Pregnant 2 10
 Not pregnant 90 929
Glasgow Coma Scale ¥ p=0.583
 Mild, n 575 3,008
 Moderate, n 0 2
 Severe, n 1 2
Legend: * Significant at p=0.05. ᶲ Calculated only for women (n=1,028). ¥ GCS is categorized as mild (13-15), moderate (9-12) and severe (≤ 8) Figure 1.

Age Distribution of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury in Honduras, 2013.


The main mechanisms of injury were falls (41.11%), road traffic (23.91%), and blunt trauma (20.82%, Figure 2). Most injuries occurred at home or in the streets (Figure 3). Overall, the vast majority of injuries were non-intentional (83.39% of patients). Only 16.58% of injuries were intentional, with 16.05% of these due to interpersonal violence and 0.53% due to self-inflected injuries (Table 1). Intentional injuries were more likely among men (p<0.001) and patients aged 18-45 (p<0.001, Table 3).

Figure 2.

Primary Mechanism of Injury for Patients with Traumatic Injury, 2013.


Figure 3.

Location at Time of Injury for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.


Table 3.

Patients with Traumatic Brain Injuries Characteristics Based on Status at Discharge (Hospitalization or Death) from the Emergency Room.

Characteristics Status Hospitalized
Alive (n=3,548) Died (n=40) p-value No (n=2,039) Yes (n=1,549) p-value
Sex, n (%) 0.023 <0.001
 Female 1,023 (28.9%) 5 (12.5%) 636 (31.3%) 392 (25.3%)
 Male 2,519 (71.1%) 35 (87.5%) 1,398 (68.7%) 1,156 (74.7%)
Age, median (IQR) 19 (7–33) 27 (20–44) <0.001 21 (7–34) 17 (8–31) 0.006
Age groups, n (%) <0.001 <0.001
 0–17 1,654 (46.8%) 5 (12.8%) 859 (42.2%) 800 (51.9%)
 18–45 1,389 (39.3%) 26 (66.7%) 863 (42.4%) 552 (35.8%)
 46–65 320 (9.1%) 2 (5.1%) 199 (9.8%) 123 (8.0%)
 66–95 172 (4.9%) 6 (15.4%) 113 (5.6%) 65 (4.2%)
Place of injury, n (%) 0.005 <0.001
 Home 1,253 (37.5%) 2 (7.7%) 781 (40.2%) 474 (33.3%)
 School 132 (3.9%) 0 (0.0%) 84 (4.3%) 48 (3.4%)
 Street 1,459 (43.7%) 19 (73.1%) 787 (40.5%) 691 (48.6%)
 Workplace 192 (5.7%) 2 (7.7%) 114 (5.9%) 80 (5.6%)
 Vehicle 148 (4.4%) 3 (11.5%) 68 (3.5%) 83 (5.8%)
 Other 158 (4.7%) 0 (0.0%) 111 (5.7%) 47 (3.3%)
Main Mechanism of Injury, n (%) <0.001 <0.001
 Road traffic collision 839 (24.2%) 19 (50.0%) 368 (18.4%) 490 (32.7%)
 Fall 1,469 (42.4%) 6 (15.8%) 872 (43.6%) 603 (40.3%)
 Blunt force 744 (21.5%) 3 (7.9%) 570 (28.5%) 177 (11.8%)
 Sharpe object injury 208 (6.0%) 2 (5.3%) 108 (5.4%) 102 (6.8%)
 Gunshot 73 (2.1%) 8 (21.1%) 29 (1.4%) 52 (3.5%)
 Other 128 (3.7%) 0 (0.0%) 54 (2.7%) 74 (4.9%)
Activity, n (%) <0.001 <0.001
 Working 463 (14.4%) 9 (45.0%) 253 (13.3%) 219 (16.4%)
 Recreation 1,301 (40.5%) 1 (5.0%) 771 (40.6%) 531 (39.8%)
 Traveling 999 (31.1%) 8 (40.0%) 564 (29.7%) 443 (33.2%)
 Drinking alcohol 151 (4.7%) 1 (5.0%) 90 (4.7%) 62 (4.6%)
 Other 301 (9.4%) 1 (5.0%) 222 (11.7%) 80 (6.0%)
Intentionality 0.007 0.06
 No-intentional 2,964 (83.6%) 27 (67.5%) 1,721 (84.4%) 1,270 (82.0%)
 Intentional 583 (16.4%) 13 (32.5%) 318 (15.6%) 278 (18.0%)

Most traumatic brain injuries seen at the UMSH were mild. Most patients had a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 15 on arrival (99.69%). Almost half (43.2%) of the patients were hospitalized, with higher injury rates in males in general (74.7%, p<0.001), individuals aged 0-17 years (51.9%, p<0.001), and more injuries occurring at home or in the streets (33.3% or 48.6%, respectively, p<0.001), caused by falls (40.3%, p<0.001), and during recreational activities or travelling (39.8% or 33.2%, respectively, p<0.001, Table 3).

Only 1.11% of the patients with a TBI died in the emergency room (Table 2). They had multiple traumas including cervical (5%), thoracic (7.5%), abdominal (7.5%), and muscle/bone (15%). These patients also had severe injuries that required surgery in 80% of the cases. Death at emergency room was significant in males (87.5%, p=0.02) and individuals with ages between 18 and 45 years (66.7%, p<0.001), and caused by non-intentional injuries (67.5%, p=0.007), in road traffic collisions (50%, p<0.001), working or travelling (45% and 40%, respectively, p<0.001), and in the streets (73.1%, p=0.005, Table 3). The modified Kampala Trauma Score median was 8 (interquartile range 7-8).

Discussion

Traumatic Brain Injury in Honduras

In general, traumatic brain injury accounted for a significant proportion of emergency department visits during the study period. This is similar to incidence rates in other Caribbean countries. An evaluation of Emergency Department admissions in Haiti demonstrated that neurotrauma, including both brain and spinal cord injuries, accounted for 28% of visits.19 At UMSH in Honduras, a majority of the injuries were mild, as assessed by the Glasgow Coma Scale, and with a low risk of mortality, as measured by modified Kampala Trauma Score.

The burden of TBI in Honduras is mainly in the youth and children. The average age of patients seen at the UMSH was 23, and the largest proportion of injuries occurred in children aged 0–17. This is in contrast to epidemiological data in the United States and Europe, where both the young and the elderly are affected by TBI. A recent systematic review of the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Europe found that TBI showed a bimodal distribution, predominantly affecting those younger than 25 years or older than 75 years.20 Males were disproportionately affected by TBI, consistent with existing epidemiological studies of these injuries in low- and middle-income countries. The main mechanisms of injury were falls and road traffic collisions. This data is similar to that obtained from traumatic brain injury emergency department admissions in the United States, where the common causes of TBI were falls (47%), being struck by/against an object (15%), and motor vehicle collisions (14%).21 In contrast, Latin America and the Caribbean have higher rates of TBI due to road traffic incidents.7

Overall, this study effectively used the InSS data to characterize TBI and potential risk factors for hospitalization, and common mechanisms of injury and outcomes using the best available information on injuries in Honduras. This data could be used to develop targeted measures to inform the development of preventive strategies, optimization of treatment, and reallocation of scarce healthcare resources. For example, public health strategies targeting motor vehicle accidents and falls could decrease the occurrence of TBI in Honduras. The introduction of trauma registry systems has been shown to improve outcomes, and even to decrease mortality.22 Data from injury surveillance systems and trauma registries may be used to develop standardized trauma protocols (STP), which have been shown to improve outcomes in traumatic brain injury. One retrospective cohort study investigating the use of an STP at a Level 1 trauma center in Colombia found improved outcomes after STP implementation: in-hospital mortality decreased (p = 0.024) and discharge GCS increased from a median of 10 to a median of 14 (p = 0.034).23,24

In addition, improving triage and diverting mild TBI to other facilities could allow a more efficient use of limited resources in managing trauma. In this study, most TBI seen at the UMSH were mild with a low risk of mortality; these injuries could potentially be managed at other facilities, freeing resources for the management of higher acuity trauma.

Limitations

There are several limitations of this study. Firstly, the InSS only captures injuries in those stable enough for emergency department admission or transfer, thus providing a limited view of overall injury patterns. However, in the absence of a codified trauma registry, the InSS does provide the best available data for characterizing injuries in Honduras. Secondly, the use of a paper-based system could also contribute to variability and error in the way injury data is recorded and coded. We did seek to minimize this error by providing clear instructions on the use of the InSS to those recording this data. Additional studies are necessary to determine the nature of these findings. Finally, the InSS does not describe injuries based on the International Classification of Disease (ICD) coding system, making it difficult to categorize Honduras’ injuries and make comparisons with other countries. However, the InSS contains sufficient data to record a Kampala Trauma Score, a measure used in resource limited settings to characterize injury severity. Finally, the last validation of the InSS was conducted in 2013, therefore, this is the last available data for research that we had access to. A further research updating our data as well as with prospective data collection methods could provide a bigger picture of the situation towards preventive strategies.

Conclusion

The paper-based Injury Surveillance System provided sufficient data on traumatic brain injury in Honduras to characterize risk factors, mechanism of injury, and injury severity. Trauma registries provide an important tool to improve understanding of epidemiology of injury, treatment regimens, and practice patterns in LIMCs. Trauma surveillance systems have the potential to transform trauma care in LMICs by identifying the specific challenges and opportunities unique to the region, as evidenced by registries instituted in Paraguay, Jamaica and Cali-Colombia.16 The InSS provides an important first step in characterizing injury patterns in Honduras, and further research in injuries is required to promote better patient-care and trauma surveillance.

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflict of Interest Statement & Funding

The Authors have no funding, financial relationships or conflicts of interest to disclose. Dr. Juan C. Puyana work is partially funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH) of the United States with the grant R21TW011151. The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect the view of the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Health and Human Services, or the United States government.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: CR, FJBE. Methodology: EJ, JCP, FJBE. Formal Analysis: FJBE. Investigation, Writing – Original Draft: EJ, FJBE. Resources: CR, JCP. Funding Acquisition: JCP. Supervision: JCP, FJBE. Data Curation: FJBE. Writing – Review & Editing: EJ, CR, JCP, FJBE.

References

1. Carroll CP, Cochran JA, Guse CE, Wang MC. Are we underestimating the burden of traumatic brain injury? Surveillance of severe traumatic brain injury using centers for disease control International classification of disease, ninth revision, clinical modification, traumatic brain injury codes. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(6):1064–1070; discussion 1070.

2. Hyder AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, Gururaj G, Kobusingye OC. The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22(5):341–353.

3. Bruns J, Jr., Hauser WA. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: a review. Epilepsia. 2003;44 Suppl 10: 2–10.

4. Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S, et al. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2018: 1–18.

5. Roozenbeek B, Maas AI, Menon DK. Changing patterns in the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9(4):231–236.

6. Bonow RH, Barber J, Temkin NR, et al. The Outcome of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Latin America. World Neurosurg. 2017.

7. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997;349(9063):1436–1442.

8. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997;349(9061):1269–1276.

9. Collaborators GBDN. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):459–480.

10. Rubiano AM, Carney N, Chesnut R, Puyana JC. Global neurotrauma research challenges and opportunities. Nature. 2015;527(7578):S193–197.

11. C. BAaM. Global Status Report on Violence Prevention 2014. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/status_report/2014/en/. Published 2014. Accessed 2017.

12. Crime UUNOoDa. Global Study on Homicide 2013. https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/statistics/GSH2013/2014_GLOBAL_HOMICIDE_BOOK_web.pdf. Published 2013. Accessed 2022.

13. Rio Navarro J, Cohen J, Rocillo Arechaga E, Zuniga E, Medecins Sans Frontieres E, Action T-H. Physical and sexual violence, mental health indicators, and treatment seeking among street-based population groups in Tegucigalpa, Honduras. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2012;31(5):388–395.

14. Haagsma JA, Graetz N, Bolliger I, et al. The global burden of injury: incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years and time trends from the Global Burden of Disease study 2013. Inj Prev. 2016;22(1):3–18.

15. Carmenate-Milián L H-RA, Ramos-Cáceres D, Lagos-Ordoñez K, Lagos-Ordoñez T, et al. Situation of the Health System in Honduras and the New Proposed Health Model. Arch Med. 2017;9(4).

16. Bonilla-Escobar FJ, Rodriguez C, Puyana JC. Trauma Care and Surveillance: International “eCapacity” Efforts and Honduras Experience. World J Surg. 2017;41(9):2415–2416.

17. Long KD, Bonilla-Escobar FJ, Rodriguez C, Puyana JC. Injury profile of children 0-14 years old in Honduras. Panam J Trauma Crit Care Emerg Surg. 2020;9(3):202–208.

18. Rodriguez C, Bonilla-Escobar FJ, Restrepo-Lopera C, Markovtsova A, Medina MT, Puyana JC. A trauma registry experience from the main referral center of Honduras: A call for action. Injury. 2019;50(4):883–889.

19. Barthélemy EJ BE, Jean-Pierre MYE, Poitevien G, Ernst S, Osborn I, Germano IM. A Prospective Emergency Department Based Study of Pattern and Outcome of Neurologic and Neurosurgical Diseases in Haiti. World Neurosurg. 2013;82(6):948–953.

20. Peeters W BRv, Polinder S, Brazinova A, Steyerberg EW, Lingsma HF, Maas AIR. Epidemiology of Traumatic Brain Injury in Europe. Acta Neurochir. 2015;157:1683–1696.

21. Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, Xu L. Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths - United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017;66(9):1–16.

22. Twijnstra MJ, Moons KG, Simmermacher RK, Leenen LP. Regional trauma system reduces mortality and changes admission rates: a before and after study. Ann Surg. 2010;251(2):339–343.

23. Kesinger MR, Nagy LR, Sequeira DJ, Charry JD, Puyana JC, Rubiano AM. A standardized trauma care protocol decreased in-hospital mortality of patients with severe traumatic brain injury at a teaching hospital in a middle-income country. Injury. 2014;45(9):1350–1354.

24. Kesinger MR, Puyana JC, Rubiano AM. Improving trauma care in low- and middle-income countries by implementing a standardized trauma protocol. World J Surg. 2014;38(8):1869–1874.


Erica Johnson, 1 MD, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Cristina Rodriguez, 2 MD, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

Juan C. Puyana, 3 MD, FRCSC, FACS, FACCP. School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Professor of Surgery, Critical Care Medicine, and Clinical Translational Science, Director for Global Health-Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. Editorial Board Member, IJMS

Francisco J. Bonilla-Escobar, 4 MD, MSc, PhD(c). Researcher, Department of Ophthalmology; Institute for Clinical Research Education (ICRE), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. CEO, Fundación Somos Ciencia al Servicio de la Comunidad, Fundación SCISCO/Science to Serve the Community Foundation, SCISCO Foundation, Cali, Colombia. Grupo de investigación en Visión y Salud Ocular, VISOC, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia. Editor in Chief, IJMS

About the Author: Erica Johnson is a recently graduated physician from the University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Correspondence: Erica Johnson. Address: 4200 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States. Email: Johnson.Erica@medstudent.pitt.edu

Editor: Mihnea-A. Gaman; Student Editors: Leah Komer & Duha Shellah; Copyeditor: Johnmark Boachie; Proofreader: Laeeqa Manji; Layout Editor: Ana Maria Morales; Process: Peer-reviewed

Cite as Johnson E, Rodriguez C, Puyana JC, Bonilla-Escobar FJ. Traumatic Brain Injury in Honduras: The Use of a Paper-based Surveillance System to Characterize Injuries Patterns. Int J Med Stud. 2022 Oct-Dec;10(4):381-386


Copyright © 2022 Erica Johnson, Cristina Rodriguez, Juan C. Puyana, Francisco J. Bonilla-Escobar.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



International Journal of Medical Students, VOLUME 10, NUMBER 4, December 2022