Abstract Requirements

All abstracts submitted to the World Conference of Medical Student Research must comply with the requirements described on this page. Abstracts that are incomplete or do not follow these instructions may be returned for correction or declined during administrative screening.

The corresponding author is responsible for confirming that the abstract, author information, submission files, and website metadata are complete and accurate before submission.

Download the Abstract Template Submit an Abstract

Requirements at a Glance

Requirement WCMSR Standard
Language English
Maximum abstract length 500 words
Keywords Three to five MeSH terms
References Not permitted
Figures and tables A maximum of one item: either one figure or one table
Official template Required
Submission website IJMS online submission system
Submission section Abstracts of the WCMSR
Previous journal publication The abstract must not have been previously published in a scientific journal
Results Completed results are required for original research submissions

Official Abstract Template

Every abstract must be prepared using the official WCMSR Abstract Template.

The template standardizes the information presented to reviewers and supports consistent formatting across accepted abstracts. Failure to use the official template may result in the submission being returned for correction.

Authors must complete all required sections of the template and upload the completed document through the IJMS submission system.

Download the Official WCMSR Abstract Template

Required Abstract Structure

The required headings depend on the type of research being submitted. Authors must use the headings applicable to their study design.

Original Research

Original research abstracts must use the following headings:

  1. Background
  2. Aim
  3. Methods
  4. Results
  5. Conclusion

This structure applies to eligible original research designs, including:

  • Case series
  • Cross-sectional studies
  • Cohort studies
  • Case-control studies
  • Ecological studies
  • Survey research
  • Randomized controlled trials
  • Non-randomized interventional studies
  • Quasi-experimental studies
  • Educational interventions
  • Diagnostic accuracy studies
  • Basic science and laboratory studies
  • Animal studies
  • Economic evaluations
  • Qualitative studies
  • Mixed-methods studies
  • Meta-analyses
Case Reports

Case report abstracts must use the following headings:

  1. Background
  2. Case
  3. Conclusion

The Case section should clearly describe the relevant clinical presentation, diagnostic assessment, intervention or management, clinical course, and patient outcome.

Information that could directly identify the patient must not be included.

Reporting Guidelines

Authors are strongly encouraged to prepare their abstracts according to the reporting guideline appropriate for their study design.

Reporting guidelines help authors provide the information needed for reviewers to assess the validity, reproducibility, transparency, and relevance of the research.

View the recommended reporting guidelines by study design
Study Design Recommended Reporting Guideline Recommended Abstract-Specific Form
Observational studies, including cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies STROBE STROBE Checklist for Conference Abstracts
Randomized controlled trials CONSORT CONSORT for Abstracts
Non-randomized or quasi-experimental interventions TREND Use the applicable TREND items when preparing the abstract
Diagnostic accuracy studies STARD STARD for Abstracts
Meta-analyses PRISMA PRISMA for Abstracts
Case reports CARE Use the applicable CARE Checklist items when preparing the abstract
Qualitative studies COREQ or SRQR Use the applicable checklist items when preparing the abstract
Economic evaluations CHEERS Use the applicable CHEERS items when preparing the abstract
Animal research ARRIVE Use the applicable ARRIVE items when preparing the abstract
Quality-improvement studies SQUIRE Use the applicable SQUIRE items when preparing the abstract
Medical education research Use the reporting guideline appropriate to the specific study design For example, STROBE, CONSORT, TREND, COREQ, or SRQR

Authors should consult the EQUATOR Network to identify the most appropriate reporting guideline when their study design is not listed above.

Submission of a completed reporting checklist is not required unless specifically requested by the IJMS Conference Team. However, authors should use the relevant checklist while writing the abstract to improve reporting completeness.

Systematic Reviews

Systematic reviews without a meta-analysis are not accepted for WCMSR. Eligible meta-analyses should be reported according to PRISMA and PRISMA for Abstracts.

Guidance for Each Abstract Section

Title

The title should clearly and accurately describe the study.

The title should:

  • Identify the principal topic or research question;
  • Reflect the study design when appropriate;
  • Identify the relevant population or setting when useful;
  • Avoid unnecessary abbreviations;
  • Avoid promotional or exaggerated language; and
  • Use clear and specific scientific terminology.

Authors should avoid vague titles such as “A Study of Medical Students” or “An Interesting Clinical Case.”

Background

The Background should briefly explain:

  • What is already known about the subject;
  • The scientific, clinical, educational, or public health problem;
  • The relevant gap in current knowledge or practice; and
  • Why the study was necessary.

The Background should be concise. It should not contain an extensive literature review or unsupported general statements.

Aim

The Aim should state the primary objective or research question clearly and directly.

When possible, the Aim should identify:

  • The population;
  • The exposure, intervention, or principal variable;
  • The comparison group, when applicable; and
  • The main outcome.

Authors should avoid including multiple unrelated objectives in one abstract.

A clear formulation may begin with:

The aim of this study was to evaluate...

or:

We investigated the association between...

Methods

The Methods section must contain enough information for reviewers to understand how the study was designed, conducted, and analyzed.

Include the following information whenever applicable:

  • Study design;
  • Country, institution, community, laboratory, or database;
  • Study period;
  • Participant or sample selection;
  • Eligibility criteria;
  • Sampling method;
  • Sample size;
  • Exposure or intervention;
  • Comparison group;
  • Primary outcome or outcome measures;
  • Data-collection methods;
  • Statistical analysis;
  • Qualitative analytic approach, when applicable; and
  • Ethics review or informed-consent information, when applicable.

Avoid vague statements such as:

Standard statistical analyses were performed.

Instead, identify the actual analysis, for example:

Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios, controlling for age, sex, and duration of disease.

Additional Requirements for Specific Designs

Randomized trials

For randomized trials, identify:

  • The intervention and comparator;
  • The method of allocation;
  • The primary outcome; and
  • The number of participants randomized and analyzed.
Diagnostic accuracy studies

For diagnostic accuracy studies, identify:

  • The index test;
  • The reference standard;
  • The study population; and
  • The measures of diagnostic performance.
Meta-analyses

For meta-analyses, identify:

  • The databases searched;
  • The final search date;
  • The eligibility criteria;
  • The number of included studies;
  • The effect measure;
  • The statistical model; and
  • The method used to assess heterogeneity or risk of bias.
Qualitative studies

For qualitative studies, identify:

  • The qualitative approach or methodology;
  • The setting and participant-selection strategy;
  • The data-collection method;
  • The number of participants, interviews, or focus groups;
  • The analytic method; and
  • Methods used to support rigor or trustworthiness.
Basic science or laboratory studies

For basic science or laboratory studies, identify:

  • The experimental model;
  • The intervention or exposure;
  • The control or comparator;
  • The principal laboratory methods;
  • The number of experimental units; and
  • The analytic methods.

Results

The Results section must present the principal findings of the study. Abstracts stating that results are pending or will be presented later will not be considered complete original research submissions.

Include the following whenever applicable:

  • The number of participants or experimental units analyzed;
  • Relevant participant or sample characteristics;
  • The primary result;
  • Effect estimates;
  • Measures of precision, such as 95% confidence intervals;
  • P-values when appropriate;
  • Absolute numbers as well as percentages;
  • Adverse events or harms for interventional studies; and
  • Principal themes for qualitative studies.

Results should be presented with sufficient numerical detail to allow reviewers to evaluate the magnitude and precision of the findings.

A clear quantitative result would be:

Among 412 participants, 89 had diabetic retinopathy, corresponding to a prevalence of 21.6% (95% confidence interval: 17.8%–25.9%).

Avoid statements such as:

The intervention was effective.

Instead, provide the observed effect and its statistical precision.

Case

For case reports, the Case section should include:

  • Relevant patient characteristics;
  • Presenting symptoms and clinical findings;
  • Relevant medical, family, or social history;
  • Diagnostic assessment;
  • Important differential diagnoses;
  • Therapeutic intervention or management;
  • Follow-up and outcome; and
  • The reason the case is educational or scientifically relevant.

Remove dates, initials, locations, images, or other details that could identify the patient unless their inclusion is ethically justified and permitted.

Authors are responsible for obtaining informed consent for publication when required by their institution, applicable law, or publication ethics standards.

Conclusion

The Conclusion should answer the study aim and should be supported directly by the results presented in the abstract.

The Conclusion should:

  • State the principal interpretation of the findings;
  • Explain the relevant clinical, scientific, educational, or public health implication;
  • Acknowledge uncertainty when appropriate; and
  • Avoid introducing information not presented in the Results.

Authors must not claim causation when the study design supports only an association.

Conclusions should not exaggerate the importance, generalizability, or certainty of the results.

Keywords

Every abstract must include a minimum of three and a maximum of five keywords.

Keywords should be selected from the Medical Subject Headings vocabulary maintained by the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Authors should:

  • Use official MeSH descriptors whenever available;
  • Select terms that represent the main subject of the study;
  • Avoid repeating the complete title as keywords;
  • Avoid overly broad terms when a more specific MeSH term exists; and
  • Verify the spelling and capitalization of each term.

Examples of MeSH terms include:

  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Medical Education
  • Public Health
  • Qualitative Research
  • Clinical Trials as Topic

Search the MeSH Browser

Figures and Tables

Authors may include a maximum of one visual element:

  • One figure; or
  • One table.

Authors may not include both a figure and a table.

The figure or table must:

  • Present information directly relevant to the abstract;
  • Be understandable without extensive additional explanation;
  • Have a clear title or legend;
  • Define all abbreviations;
  • Use readable text and labels;
  • Not duplicate information already fully presented in the text;
  • Not include patient-identifying information; and
  • Be the original work of the authors or used with appropriate permission.

A figure or table that is illegible, incomplete, misleading, or unrelated to the principal findings may be removed or returned for correction.

References

References, citations, footnotes, and bibliographic lists are not permitted in WCMSR abstracts.

Authors should summarize the relevant scientific context concisely in the Background section without including numbered or author-date citations.

Language and Formatting

General language and formatting requirements

Abstracts must be written in clear, professional scientific English.

Authors are responsible for:

  • Grammar and spelling;
  • Scientific terminology;
  • Accuracy of numerical information;
  • Consistency between the abstract and submission metadata;
  • Correct author names and affiliations;
  • Correct figure and table labels; and
  • Compliance with the official template.

The IJMS Conference Team does not assume responsibility for correcting grammatical, semantic, statistical, or graphical errors in submitted abstracts.

Authors who are not fluent in English are encouraged to have the abstract reviewed by a proficient English speaker before submission.

Abbreviations

Abbreviations should be limited to terms used repeatedly in the abstract.

Write the term in full at first mention, followed by the abbreviation in parentheses. The abbreviation may then be used throughout the remainder of the abstract.

Avoid abbreviations in the title whenever possible.

Numbers and Statistical Reporting

Authors should:

  • Report absolute numbers with percentages when applicable;
  • Use consistent decimal places;
  • Identify the statistical test or model used;
  • Report effect estimates with confidence intervals when appropriate;
  • Avoid reporting only that a result was statistically significant;
  • Use exact P-values when practical; and
  • Avoid excessive precision unsupported by the data.

Originality and Research Integrity

Prohibited practices

All abstracts must represent original and ethically conducted work.

The following practices are prohibited:

  • Plagiarism;
  • Self-plagiarism or inappropriate text recycling;
  • Fabrication of data;
  • Falsification or manipulation of data;
  • Duplicate submission of the same abstract;
  • Misrepresentation of authorship;
  • Undisclosed conflicts of interest;
  • Manipulation of figures or images that changes their meaning; and
  • Submission of research that was conducted without required ethical oversight.

Abstracts may undergo plagiarism screening before scientific peer review. A submission containing plagiarism or another serious research integrity concern may be declined without external review.

Previous Publication

Submitted abstracts must not have been previously published in another scientific journal.

When an abstract has previously been presented at another conference, posted in a repository, or disseminated in another format, the corresponding author should disclose this information to the IJMS Conference Team before or during submission.

When authors believe that a previously disseminated abstract remains eligible for consideration, they must provide a complete explanation by emailing conference@ijms.info.

Ethics Approval and Informed Consent

Research involving human participants, identifiable human data, human biological material, or animals must comply with the ethical and regulatory requirements applicable to the institution and country in which the research was conducted.

When applicable, the Methods section should identify:

  • The approving ethics committee or institutional review board;
  • Whether informed consent was obtained or waived; and
  • Relevant animal welfare or institutional animal-care approval.

The IJMS Conference Team may request supporting documentation when ethical approval, consent, or regulatory compliance is unclear.

Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools

Authors may use generative artificial intelligence tools for limited language or editorial assistance only when such use complies with IJMS policies.

Artificial intelligence tools:

  • Must not be listed as authors;
  • Must not be used to fabricate data, results, citations, or references;
  • Must not replace author verification of scientific accuracy;
  • Must not be used to conceal plagiarism or duplicate publication; and
  • Must not be provided with confidential or identifiable patient information.

Authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, integrity, and content of the submitted abstract, regardless of whether an artificial intelligence tool was used.

Common Reasons for Administrative Return

A submission may be returned to the corresponding author before peer review when:

  • The official abstract template was not used;
  • The abstract exceeds 500 words;
  • The required headings are missing;
  • The abstract does not include results;
  • Fewer than three or more than five keywords are provided;
  • The keywords are not based on MeSH terminology;
  • References are included;
  • More than one figure or table is included;
  • Both a figure and a table are included;
  • The submission metadata are incomplete or inconsistent;
  • Author names or affiliations differ between the template and website;
  • Required ORCID identifiers are missing;
  • The wrong submission section was selected;
  • Proof of payment is missing;
  • The abstract reports an ineligible study design;
  • The abstract appears to have been previously published; or
  • Ethics or patient-consent information requires clarification.

When correction is possible, the corresponding author may be given an opportunity to revise the submission before the deadline. Failure to respond within the requested period may result in the submission being declined.

Final Submission Checklist

Before submitting, confirm that:

  • The official WCMSR Abstract Template has been used.
  • The abstract is written in English.
  • The abstract does not exceed 500 words.
  • The title clearly identifies the research topic.
  • The required section headings are included.
  • The Methods section identifies the study design.
  • The Results section reports completed findings.
  • The Conclusion is supported by the reported results.
  • Three to five MeSH keywords are included.
  • No references or citations are included.
  • No more than one figure or one table is included.
  • All abbreviations are defined at first use.
  • All author names and affiliations are accurate.
  • The abstract and website metadata contain identical information.
  • The applicable reporting guideline has been reviewed.
  • Ethics approval and consent information are included when applicable.
  • The abstract has not been previously published in a scientific journal.
  • The abstract has been reviewed for grammar, accuracy, and readability.
  • Proof of payment is ready to be uploaded.
  • Abstracts of the WCMSR will be selected as the submission section.

Important Submission Notice

The information entered in the IJMS submission system must match the information contained in the uploaded abstract template. This includes the title, author names, author order, affiliations, corresponding author information, keywords, and abstract text.

Inconsistencies may delay administrative screening and may require correction before the abstract can proceed to peer review.

Questions About Abstract Preparation?

Contact the IJMS Conference Team at conference@ijms.info.

When asking about an existing submission, include the submission number displayed in the submission URL.

Download the Abstract Template Submit an Abstract