PREVALENCE, KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE AND PRACTICE OF FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATILATION AND CUTTING (FGM/C) AMONG MEN IN KHARTOUM STATE FOR THE YEAR 2022

Authors

  • Ethar Sadig Fifth-year Medical Student. Khartoum University, Faculty of Medicine, Khartoum, Sudan.

Keywords:

Global Health, Female Circumcision, Females

Abstract

ABSTRACT: 

Background: Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is a common practice in developing countries, including Sudan, and presents a major health problem.

Methods: In this study, we aimed to assess prevalence, knowledge, attitude and practice towards FGM/C among men age 18-50 years in Khartoum state, Sudan. Community based  cross-sectional study was conducted in selected cities of Khartoum state, Sudan. Socio-demographic characteristics, prevalence of FGM in the families of targeted men, knowledge about the ill health effect of FGM, men attitude towards the practice and other information was collected from 289 systematically selected men by using a pre-tested structured questionnaire .

Results: A total of 289 men were included in the study of which about (91%) of them were within the age group 18-30 years. The majority were originally from Al-Gazira (70%) and Al-Shimalia state (67%) and (99.3%) were Muslims. Most (82.3%) of the participants studied till university level and (0.3%) stopped at primary school. (28.5%) of the respondents say that all females in their families underwent circumcision, (22.6%) said that some of them underwent circumcision, (25,3%) said that none of them underwent it and (23.6) said that they don’t know whether females in their families' undergone circumcision or not. Of those who had daughters (14.9%) never expose anyone of their daughters to circumcision. Majority (83%) of the men reported the unimportance of marrying a circumcised woman for them as well as (81.9%) refusing to marry a one. More than three quarters (80%) of the men reported the practice should be stopped and only (10%) of men supported that FGM/C should be maintained in the society. (81%) agreed that they will never expose their future daughters to circumcision versus (19%) of the men had the intention of exposing their future daughters to the mildest form of Sunni type FGM/C practice.

Conclusion: The prevalence of FGM/C was found to be high among the females in the families of the respondents, but there is a trend among the males of this generation and the future generation towards stopping FGM/C practice in their communities.

Keywords: Attitude; female genital mutilation; knowledge; practice; prevalence; Sudan

 

Graph: Shows the overall Knowledge score about FGM. 

 

The overall Knowledge score was the highest in a moderate level (34%). While good were only (1%). 

 

 

References

1.Organization WH. Female genital mutilation. Fact sheet No 241, Updated February; 2014. 2014.

2. Organization WH. A systematic review of the health complications of female genital mutilation including squeal

in childbirth. 2000.

3. Organization WH, UNICEF, Association WM. Global strategy to stop healthcare providers from performing

female genital mutilation. 2010.

4. Mutilation FG. A joint WHO/UNICEF. UNFPA statement. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997.

5. Organization WH. Female genital mutilation. A Joint WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA Statement. UNFPA Statement.

Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997.

6. Ali, A. A. A. (2012). Knowledge and attitudes of female genital mutilation among midwives in Eastern Sudan.

Reproductive Health, 9(1), 1-4.

7. Ahmed MR, Shaaban MM, Meky HK, Amin Arafa ME, Mohamed TY, Gharib WF, et al. Psychological impact of

female genital mutilation among adolescent Egyptian girls: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health

Care 2017;22(4):280–285. Epub 2017/08/18. doi: https://doi.org/10. 1080/13625187.2017.1355454. PubMed PMID:

28816075.

8. Almroth L, Almroth-Berggren V, Hassanein OM, Al-Said SS, Hasan SS, Lithell UB, et al. Male complications of

female genital mutilation. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(11):1455–60 Epub 2001/11/17. PubMed PMID: 11710420.

9. World Health Organization. Female genital mutilation, Report of a WHO Technical Working Group, Geneva:

WHO 1995.

10. Circumcision SF. They weren’t talking.

11. Berg RC, Denison E. Interventions to reduce the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting in African

countries. Campbell Systematic Reviews 2012:9. www.campbellcollaboration.org/lib/download/2101/ Accessed on

12 September 2013

12. Abate A, Kifle M, Nebreed F. Prevalence of female genital mutilation and attitude of mothers towards it in serbo

town. Ethiop J Health Sci 2002;12(2):59-68.

13. Population Reference Bureau. Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Data and Trends, Update 2010. 2010.

http://www.prb.org/pdf10/fgm-wallchart2010.pdf Accessed on 12 September 2013.

14. Al Awar, S., Al-Jefout, M., Osman, N. et al. Prevalence, knowledge, attitude and practices of female genital

mutilation and cutting (FGM/C) among United Arab Emirates population. BMC Women's Health 20, 79 (2020).

15. Hussein MA, Adem A, Mohammed MA. Knowledge, attitude and practice of female genital mutilation among

women in Jigjiga Town, Eastern Ethiopia. Gaziantep Med J. 2013 Jul 1;19(3):164-8.

16. Onuh SO, Igberase GO, Umeora JO, Okogbenin SA, Otoide VO, Gharoro EP. Female genital mutilation:

knowledge, attitude and practice among nurses. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006 Mar;98(3):409-14. PMID: 16573307;

PMCID: PMC2576104.

33

17. Almahdi, S.S.M. and Osman, A.A.A., 2022. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice OF Prepucectomy among

Medical Personnel in Omdurman Locality Obstetric and Gynecological Hospitals 2019. Int J Women’s Health Care,

7 (2), 104, 109, p.2.

18. Kandala N-B, Ezejimofor MC, Uthman OA, Komba P. Secular trends in the prevalence of female genital

mutilation/cutting among girls: a systematic analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(5):e000549.

19. Alkhalaileh D, Hayford SR, Norris AH, Gallo MF. Prevalence and attitudes on female genital mutilation/cutting

in Egypt since criminalisation in 2008. Culture Health Sex. 2018;20(2):173–82.

20. WHO F. WMH. Eliminating female genital mutilation: an interagency statement. UNAIDS, UNDP, UNECA.

UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCHR, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHO. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.

21. Organization WH. Understanding and addressing violence against women: intimate partner violence: World

Health Organization; 2012.http://www.who. int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/en/index.html, and from

the Pan American Health Organization web site: www.paho.org.

22. Ismail SA, Abbas AM, Habib D, Morsy H, Saleh MA, Bahloul M. Effect of female genital mutilation/cutting;

types I and II on sexual function: casecontrolled study. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):108.

23. Yassin K, Idris HA, Ali AA. Characteristics of female sexual dysfunctions and obstetric complications related to

female genital mutilation in Omdurman maternity hospital. Sudan Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):7.

24. RCM R, RCOG EN. UNITE (2013) Tackling FGM in the UK: intercollegiate recommendations for identifying,

recording, and reporting. London: Royal College of Midwives ISBN1(870822). p. 33.

25. Berg RC, Denison E. Does female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) affect women’s sexual functioning? A

systematic review of the sexual consequences of FGM/C. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2012;9(1):41–56.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-18

How to Cite

Sadig, E. (2026). PREVALENCE, KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE AND PRACTICE OF FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATILATION AND CUTTING (FGM/C) AMONG MEN IN KHARTOUM STATE FOR THE YEAR 2022. International Journal of Medical Students. Retrieved from https://ijms.info/IJMS/article/view/4668

Issue

Forthcoming

Section

Abstracts of the WCMSR

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Ethar Sadig

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site; with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
    2. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
    4. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
    5. The Author represents and warrants that:
      1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
      2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
      3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
      4. the Work has not previously been published;
      5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
      6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
    6. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from the Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Enforcement of copyright

The IJMS takes the protection of copyright very seriously.

If the IJMS discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, the IJMS may bring legal proceedings against you seeking reparation and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.

If you become aware of any use of the IJMS' copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org

 

Infringing material

If you become aware of any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org