Meta-Analysis on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Anatomical Identification of Pelvic Autonomic Nerves in Laparoscopic and Robotic Colorectal Surgery

Authors

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Pelvic Nerves, Colorectal Surgery, Laparoscopy, Robotic Surgery, Nerve-Sparing

Abstract

Background: The anatomical identification of pelvic autonomic nerves and safe dissection planes is crucial in laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery, as improper recognition can cause severe nerve damage, affecting urinary and sexual function. Intraoperative artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool to enhance this task, providing real-time assistance to the surgeon. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of AI for anatomical recognition compared to surgery without AI and determine its impact on surgical accuracy and patient safety.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to identify clinical studies evaluating the use of AI in laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery, specifically in the identification of pelvic autonomic nerves. Only studies presenting comparative results on the efficacy of AI versus standard surgery were included. Data analysis was performed using a random-effects model to estimate the combined effect of AI on anatomical recognition. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore variations in results based on nerve type and surgical approach.

Results: Eight relevant studies were selected, including both clinical trials and observational studies. Five of these studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and data extracted were used for the meta-analysis. The combined anatomical recognition rate assisted by AI was 69.1% (95% CI: 44.7%-86.0%), with high heterogeneity (I²=85.6%). Subgroups showed that AI was more effective in identifying lumbar splanchnic nerves, with a recognition rate of 89.8% (95% CI: 81.3%-94.7%). Assistance was moderate for hypogastric nerves (62.7%; 95% CI: 36.4%-83.2%) and lower for pelvic visceral nerves (22.0%; 95% CI: 11.9%-37.2%). Other studies supported the viability of AI-based recognition through segmentation or performance metrics, but results could not be grouped due to incompatible outcomes.

Conclusion: Intraoperative AI navigation for minimally invasive colorectal surgery shows promising anatomical support, especially for lumbar splanchnic nerves, which could reduce the risk of nerve damage during dissection. However, current evidence is preliminary, heterogeneous, and dominated by small observational studies. Despite positive findings, standardized and larger comparative trials are needed to determine whether improved anatomical recognition with AI translates into fewer long-term complications, such as urinary or sexual dysfunction. The implementation of AI in surgical settings could represent a significant advancement, but its effectiveness and safety require validation in larger and more diverse studies.

Figure 1. Forest Plot of the Meta-Analysis on the Rate of Anatomical Recognition Assisted by AI in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery

References

Ryu S, Goto K, Kitagawa T, Kobayashi T, Shimada J, Ito R, Nakabayashi Y. Real-time Artificial Intelligence Navigation-Assisted Anatomical Recognition in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2023;66(9):1019-1027. doi:10.1007/s11605-023-05819-1.

Kinoshita K, Maruyama T, Kobayashi N, Imanishi S, Maruyama M, Ohira G, Endo S, Tochigi T, Kinoshita M, Fukui Y, Kumazu Y, Kita J, Shinohara H, Matsubara H. An artificial intelligence-based nerve recognition model is useful as surgical support technology and as an educational tool in laparoscopic and robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery. Surg Endosc. 2024;38(4):1031-1040. doi:10.1007/s00464-024-10939-z.

Kitaguchi D, Harai Y, Kosugi N, Hayashi K, Kojima S, Ishikawa Y, Yamada A, Hasegawa H, Takeshita N, Ito M. Artificial intelligence for the recognition of key anatomical structures in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2023;110(12):1342-1350. doi:10.1093/bjs/znad249.

Han F, Zhong G, Zhi S, Han N, Jiang Y, Tan J, Zhong L, Zhou S. Artificial Intelligence Recognition System of Pelvic Autonomic Nerve During Total Mesorectal Excision. PMC. 2024. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11837963/

.

Ryu S, Goto K, Imaizumi Y, Iwauchi S, Kobayashi T, Ito R, Nakabayashi Y. Artificial intelligence-enhanced navigation for nerve recognition and surgical education in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. PMC. 2025. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11794642/

.

Xie Y, Zhong G, Yang B, Han F, Zhou S, Tan J. Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Resection With Pelvic Autonomic Nerve Preservation in Males: A Prospective Single-Center Study. PubMed. 2026. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41618056/

.

Spinelli A, Carrano FM, Laino ME, Pellino G, Andreozzi M, Koleth G, Hassan C, Repici A, Chand M, Savevski V. Artificial intelligence in colorectal surgery: an AI-powered systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2023;38(8):2511-2519. doi:10.1007/s10151-023-02772-8.

Xie Y, Zhong G, Yang B, Han F, Zhou S, Tan J. Exploring the impact of an artificial intelligence-based intraoperative image navigation system in laparoscopic surgery on clinical outcomes: A protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Preprint. 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.05.24310603

.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-18

How to Cite

Rodriguez Alvarado, M., Reyes Gaytan, L. A., Nava Vazquez, J. A., Gomez Calvo, D., Huerta Galicia , E., & Cueto Urquieta, J. (2026). Meta-Analysis on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Anatomical Identification of Pelvic Autonomic Nerves in Laparoscopic and Robotic Colorectal Surgery . International Journal of Medical Students. Retrieved from https://ijms.info/IJMS/article/view/4707

Issue

Section

Abstracts of the WCMSR

Categories