National Pediatric Ophthalmology Survey: Workforce Shortages, Telemedicine, and Advocacy Priorities
Keywords:
pediatric, telemedicine, health workforce, health surveys, ophthalmology education.Abstract
Background: Pediatric ophthalmology faces ongoing workforce shortages, reimbursement concerns, geographic disparities in care access, and increasing advocacy demands.1,2 This study aimed to assess pediatric ophthalmologists’ perspectives regarding workforce challenges, telemedicine utilization, advocacy priorities, financial concerns, and social determinants of health impacting pediatric eye care delivery.
Methods: An anonymous Likert-scale-based survey was distributed through the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) online member discussion board using a REDCap survey link. Eligible participants included practicing pediatric ophthalmologists, pediatric ophthalmology fellows, and physicians retired within the past 10 years. Descriptive statistics and comparative analyses were performed in R statistical software. Responses were stratified by years since completion of pediatric ophthalmology fellowship training (fellow, <5 years, 6–10 years, 11–15 years, and >15 years). Fisher’s exact tests were used for categorical comparisons, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
Results: A total of 67 respondents completed the survey; 64% identified as female, 34% as male, and 2% preferred not to disclose. Most participants (n=47, 71%) agreed that telemedicine improves access to pediatric ophthalmology care amid ongoing workforce shortages, including 52 respondents (76%) who agreed that retinopathy of prematurity can be adequately screened using telemedicine-based approaches. Nearly all respondents (n=63, 94%) reported that compensation concerns influence residents’ decisions not to pursue pediatric ophthalmology, and 66 respondents (98%) agreed that current reimbursement structures inadequately reflect the workload associated with the subspecialty.
Lack of time was the most identified barrier to advocacy involvement. Frequently selected advocacy priorities included expanding insurance coverage and increasing public awareness of childhood eye disease. 60 (90%) agreed that social determinants of health significantly impact pediatric ophthalmic outcomes.
Comparative analyses stratified by years since fellowship training demonstrated a significant difference in concern regarding reductions in pediatric ophthalmology research funding opportunities (p = 0.028). Among the 60 respondents who agreed this was a concern, 46 (77%) had completed formal fellowship training more than 10 years prior.
Conclusion: Respondents broadly supported telemedicine as a strategy to improve access to pediatric ophthalmology care amid ongoing workforce shortages, including for retinopathy of prematurity screening. Financial considerations emerged as a major perceived barrier to recruitment into pediatric ophthalmology, with nearly all participants reporting that current reimbursement structures inadequately reflect the specialty’s workload and demands. More senior pediatric ophthalmologists expressed significantly greater concern regarding declining research funding opportunities, potentially reflecting generational differences in perspectives on the long-term implications of sustained research support within the field.
References
1. Kumar A, Morse JR, Wong RK, Oatts JT. Factors associated with resident pursuit of pediatric ophthalmology fellowship. J AAPOS. Published online August 11, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2025.104606
2. Ali AA, Healy J, Chauhan MZ, et al. Forecasting Retirement in Pediatric Ophthalmology. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023;141(8):796-798. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.2710
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Julia Moore, Ryan Shean, Zaid Ali, Amna Ali, Munib Far, Jacob Larsen, Emily McCourt

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site; with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from the Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Enforcement of copyright
The IJMS takes the protection of copyright very seriously.
If the IJMS discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, the IJMS may bring legal proceedings against you seeking reparation and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.
If you become aware of any use of the IJMS' copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org
Infringing material
If you become aware of any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org



