A Pilot Study of the Effect of a Change in the Scheduling of Canadian Medical Licensing Examinations on Two Cohorts of Students Studying in Ireland

Authors

  • Kate Niethammer National University of Ireland Galway, Nui Galway, Ireland
  • Pishoy Gouda Final Year Medical Student, National University of Ireland Galway, Nui Galway, Ireland. Past-Chairperson of the Association of Medical Students in Ireland, Student Editor of IJMS.
  • Edina Moylett MB, BCH, BAO, LRCPI, LRCSI, DCH, MRCPI, Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Paediatrics, Clinical Science Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Nui Galway, Ireland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2015.112

Keywords:

Students, Medica, Education, Educational Measurement, Emigration and Immigration

Abstract

Background: The Medical Council of Canada and most Canadian residency programs require international medical graduates seeking training in Canada to pass the Medical Council of Canada Entrance Examination, in addition to the newly established National Collaborative Assessment. In order to facilitate this additional examination, the Medical Council of Canada has altered the suggested examination timeline and examination eligibility criteria. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was sent via an online survey tool to members of the North American Irish Medical Student Association. The survey aimed to elicit differences in the Medical Council of Canada Entrance Examination experience between two cohorts of Canadians studying abroad in Ireland: those who completed the examination before and after the new timeline. Statistical analysis was conducted with independent t-tests and Pearson’s Chi-Square tests using SPSS version 21. Results: Of 24 respondents, 13 had completed the examination after the timeline change. Participants who attended the examination prior to the change achieved higher results (353.8 ± 56.5) than participants who attended the examination after the change (342.3 ± 35.1), although not statistically significant (p=0.56). In the cohort who took the examination after the timeline change, 61.5% of participants expressed discontent with their examination results; 84.6% ‘strongly agreed’ or ‘agreed’ to feeling disadvantaged due to the change. Conclusion: The new Medical Council of Canada examination timeline has had an impact on the examination experience of Canadians studying in Ireland. Simple modifications to the current timeline are warranted to reduce unnecessary disadvantage for this cohort of students applying to postgraduate training...

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Kate Niethammer, National University of Ireland Galway, Nui Galway, Ireland

Kate Niethammer is a fifth year medical student at the National University of Ireland, Galway of a five year medical program. She is the recipient of the Berman Prize in Medical  Informatics in 2011, from the National University of Ireland, Galway

References

1. Gouda P, Fanous S, Gouda J. Challenges faced by international medical stu¬dents due to changes in Canadian entrance exam policy. Int J Med Students. 2014 Nov-2015 Mar;3(1):70-1.
2. Barer ML, Evans RG, Hedden L. False hope for Canadians who study medi¬cine abroad. CMAJ. 2014 Apr 15;186(7):552.
3. Satkauskas R, Pavilanis A. The plight of immigrant physicians in Canada. Can Fam Physician. 1990 Jan;36:119-27.
4. Esmail T, Gouda P. Impact of changes in Canadian postgraduate training on the Irish health service. Ir Med J. 2015 Jan;108(1):28.
5. Walsh A, Banner S, Schabort I, Armson H, Bowmer MI, Granata B. Interna¬tional medical graduates - current issues. Members of the Future of Medical Education in Canada Postgraduate (FMEC PG) Project consortium; 2011.
6. Watts E, Davies JC, Metcalfe D. The Canadian international medical gradua¬te bottleneck: a new problem for new doctors. CMEJ. 2011:2(2):86-90.
7. Schabort I, Mercuri M, Grierson LE. Predicting international medical gra¬duate success on college certification examinations: responding to the
Thomson and Cohl judicial report on IMG selection. Can Fam Physician. 2014 Oct;60(10):e478-84.
8. Taghizadegan S. The underutilization of international medical graduates in Ontario and Canada: a selective review of the existing literature on the expe¬riences of international medical graduates in the context of Canadian health care policies [dissertation]. [Toronto]: Ryerson University; 2013.
9. Thomson G, Cohl K. IMG selection: independent review of access to post¬graduate programs by international medical graduates in Ontario; 2011.
10. Hofmeister M, Lockyer J, Crutcher R. The multiple mini-interview for se¬lection of international medical graduates into family medicine residency education. Med Educ. 2009 Jun;43(6):573-9.
11. Takahashi SG, Rothman A, Nayer M, Urowitz MB, Crescenzi AM. Validation of a large-scale clinical examination for international medical graduates. Can Fam Physician. 2012 Jul;58(7):e408-17.
12. Hertzog MA. Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Res Nurs Health. 2008 Apr;31(2):180-91

Downloads

Published

2015-03-31

How to Cite

Niethammer, K., Gouda, P., & Moylett, E. (2015). A Pilot Study of the Effect of a Change in the Scheduling of Canadian Medical Licensing Examinations on Two Cohorts of Students Studying in Ireland. International Journal of Medical Students, 3(1), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2015.112

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015)

Section

Original Article

Categories

License

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site; with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
    2. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
    4. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
    5. The Author represents and warrants that:
      1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
      2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
      3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
      4. the Work has not previously been published;
      5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
      6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
    6. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from the Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Enforcement of copyright

The IJMS takes the protection of copyright very seriously.

If the IJMS discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, the IJMS may bring legal proceedings against you seeking reparation and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.

If you become aware of any use of the IJMS' copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org

 

Infringing material

If you become aware of any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org