This is an outdated version published on 2022-12-31. Read the most recent version.

The Prevalence of Frank’s Sign and the Diagnostic Accuracy in Coronary Artery Disease Among Chest Pain Patients at Lampang Hospital, Thailand

Authors

  • Kanjanaporn Thammasaranggoon
  • Narawish Khanthamoon
  • Pitsinee Sangphet
  • Aookrit Pattamapornpong
  • Yotsawee Chotechuang Lampang Hospital, Lampang
  • Maytinee Srisubin
  • Somluck Ninwaranon
  • Jakkrawal Huntrakul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2022.1760

Keywords:

Diagonal earlobe creases(DELC), Frank's sign, Coronary artery disease, Angina chest pain

Abstract

Background: One of the leading cause of death in Thailand is coronary artery disease (CAD). There are several studies that demonstrated a significant correlation between diagonal earlobe creases (DELC) or Frank’s sign and CAD, but data in Thai populations still remains unclear. Because of Frank’s sign is easily to observe by health-care professional including medical students, so it was very interesting to use to identify risk of atherosclerosis of the patients in hospital which has limitation of resources. The purpose of the study was to assess the prevalence of Frank’s sign and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy in CAD among the angina chest pain patients at Lampang Hospital.

Methods: This study was a cross-sectional, observational, study. Three hundred and nine patients with angina chest pain who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) and followed up at the coronary clinic at Lampang Hospital were enrolled in the study. Both ears of the patients were inspected for Frank’s sign. The accuracy of Frank’s sign was confirmed by three cardiologists and clinical data was collected in medical record form. We excluded the patients whose earlobe could not be clearly observed, including those with keloid/ulcer on the earlobe or those with no earlobe. The correlation of Frank’s sign and CAD were analyzed by using logistic regression and receiving operative curve (ROC) curve.  

Results: 64.4% of the angina chest pain patients (N=199) have demonstrated for Frank’s sign, unilateral Frank’s sign in 12.3% (N=38) and bilateral Frank’s sign in 52.1% (N=161). Twenty-one patients (6.8%) were normal CAG and 288 patients (93.2%) were significant CAD, single vessel disease CAD (N=86), double vessel disease CAD (N=83) and triple vessel disease CAD (N=119). The diagnostic accuracy of the Frank’s sign revealed that 64.6% for the sensitivity and 38.1% for the specificity. Besides, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 0.935 and for negative predictive value (NPV) showed 0.073. Nevertheless, the positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 1.032 and 0.947 for the negative likelihood ratio (LR-). Moreover, the area under the curve (AuROC) of Frank’s sign with respect to detection of CAD was 0.513 (95% Confidence Interval was 0.385-0.642, P= 0.838).

 

Conclusions: Frank’s sign was observed in two-third of angina chest pain patients at Lampang Hospital and mostly of the patients with Frank’s sign were significant CAD. The results of this study showed that Frank’s sign was a simple, non-expensive and non-invasive method for medical student and health-care professional to identify risk of CAD.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31

Versions

How to Cite

Thammasaranggoon, K., Khanthamoon, N., Sangphet, P., Pattamapornpong, A., Chotechuang, Y., Srisubin, M., Ninwaranon, S., & Huntrakul, J. (2022). The Prevalence of Frank’s Sign and the Diagnostic Accuracy in Coronary Artery Disease Among Chest Pain Patients at Lampang Hospital, Thailand. International Journal of Medical Students, 10, S194. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2022.1760

Issue

Vol 10 (2022): Supplement 1

Section

Abstracts of the WCMSR

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Kanjanaporn Thammasaranggoon, Narawish Khanthamoon, Pitsinee Sangphet, Aookrit Pattamapornpong, Yotsawee Chotechuang, Maytinee Srisubin, Somluck Ninwaranon, Jakkrawal Huntrakul

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site; with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
    2. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
    4. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
    5. The Author represents and warrants that:
      1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
      2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
      3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
      4. the Work has not previously been published;
      5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
      6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
    6. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from the Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Enforcement of copyright

The IJMS takes the protection of copyright very seriously.

If the IJMS discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, the IJMS may bring legal proceedings against you seeking reparation and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.

If you become aware of any use of the IJMS' copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org

 

Infringing material

If you become aware of any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org