A Narrative Review on Quality Improvements for Radiology Clerkships from Medical Student

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2023.1987

Keywords:

Radiology, Clerkship, Medical student, Quality improvement, Diagnostic imaging, Radiologists' training, Radiology education, Curriculum structure, Educational practices, Challenges in clerkships, Medical student perceptions, Likert scale, Interventional methods, Virtual options, Flipped classroom, Interactive workstations, Simulators, COVID-19 pandemic, Traditional didactic format, Barriers to improvement, Review articles, Prospective cohort studies, Observational studies, Case studies

Abstract

Radiology clerkships have the potential to give medical students a better appreciation of a radiologist’s responsibilities toward patient care while raising interest and improving student confidence in diagnostic imaging skills.  Unfortunately, many radiology clerkships across the US have developed a reputation for being unorganized and unengaging. This narrative review is focused on summarizing various clerkship practices performed across the US that have been well received by students, as well as specific weaknesses of the traditional clerkship format from the student perspective, with the aim of effective approaches to revamping electives to showcase the realities of the specialty while also attracting bright and motivated students. This narrative review examined 28 studies that gathered survey responses from medical students who completed radiology clerkships to determine their perceptions towards the clerkship. Major findings to be discussed in detail include weaknesses with the traditional format related to passive learning through observing, unclear expectations for medical students, and certain challenges that clerkship directors may face while attempting to implement changes to their clerkship. This narrative review will also discuss specific well-received practices involving more active learning, including interactive workstations, interactive simulators, flipped classrooms, case banks, and online learning modules.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Lee H, Kim DH, Hong PP. Radiology Clerkship Requirements in Canada and the United States: Current State and Impact on Residency Application. JACR. 2020;17(4):515-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.11.026

Poot JD, Hartman MS, Daffner RH. Understanding the US Medical School Requirements and Medical Students’ Attitudes about Radiology Rotations. Acad. Radiol. 2012;19(3):369-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2011.11.005

Darras KE, Spouge R, Kang H, et al. The Challenge with Clinical Radiology Electives: Student and Faculty Perspectives Identify Areas for Improvement. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2019;70(4):337-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2019.07.004

Lo L, Awan OA. To Engage or Not to Engage: A New Era for Medical Student Education in Radiology. RadioGraphics. 2020;40(7):1830-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2020200002

Webb EM, Ahearn B, Naeger DM. A Designated “Teaching Resident”: A Novel Leadership Position to Promote Educational Skills and an Academic Career. JACR. 2016;13(1):77-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2015.06.013

Gunderman RB, Hill DV. Student Concerns and Misconceptions about A Career in Radiology. Acad. Radiol. 2012;19(3):366-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2011.10.028

Saha A, Roland RA, Hartman MS, Daffner RH. Radiology Medical Student Education: An Outcome-based Survey of PGY-1 Residents. Acad. Radiol. 2013;20(3):284-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2012.10.006

Chan D, Sakya SM, Pfeifer CM. United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Pass-or-Fail Reporting: Student Perspectives on Implications for Medical Student Education in Diagnostic Radiology. JACR. 2020;17(12):1670-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.04.031

Straus CM, Webb EM, Kondo KL, et al. Medical Student Radiology Education: Summary and Recommendations From a National Survey of Medical School and Radiology Department Leadership. JACR. 2014;11(6):606-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2014.01.012

Larocque N, Lee SY, Monteiro S, Finlay K. Reform of a Senior Medical Student Radiology Elective Using a Needs Assessment. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2018;69(3):253-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2018.01.005

Mullins ME, Lieberman G, Shaffer K, Novelline RA. Factors to consider in revising educational objectives for medical students in radiology clerkships. JACR. 2005;2(1):55-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2004.07.004

Benedetti NJ, Naeger DM, Webb EM. Radiology Primer: A Novel Radiology Course for Undecided Medical Students. JACR. 2014;11(12, Part A):1182-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2014.05.017

Naeger DM, Phelps A, Kohi M, Elicker B, Ordovas K, Webb EM. Reading room electives: say goodbye to the “radi-holiday”. JACR. 2013;10(6):442-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2012.09.023

Redmond CE, Healy GM, Fleming H, McCann JW, Moran DE, Heffernan EJ. The Integration of Active Learning Teaching Strategies Into a Radiology Rotation for Medical Students Improves Radiological Interpretation Skills and Attitudes Toward Radiology. Curr. Probl. Diagn. Radiol. 2020;49(6):386-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.07.007

Belfi LM, Bartolotta RJ, Giambrone AE, Davi C, Min RJ. “Flipping” the Introductory Clerkship in Radiology: Impact on Medical Student Performance and Perceptions. Acad. Radiol. 2015;22(6):794-801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2014.11.003

O’Connor EE, Fried J, McNulty N, et al. Flipping Radiology Education Right Side Up. Acad. Radiol. 2016;23(7):810-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.02.011

Desai NS, Bunch PM, DiSalvo DN, et al. The Use of an Integrated Website to Enhance the Educational Experience in a Medical School Radiology Clerkship Course. Curr. Probl. Diagn. Radiol.. 2016;45(1):17-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.03.002

Friedman MV, Demertzis JL, Hillen TJ, Long JR, Rubin DA. Impact of an Interactive Diagnostic Case Simulator on a Medical Student Radiology Rotation. AJR. 2017;208(6):1256-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17537

Belfi LM, Dean KE, Bartolotta RJ, Shih G, Min RJ. Medical student education in the time of COVID-19: A virtual solution to the introductory radiology elective. Clin Imaging. 2021;75:67-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.01.013

Gomez E, Azadi J, Magid D. Innovation Born in Isolation: Rapid Transformation of an In-Person Medical Student Radiology Elective to a Remote Learning Experience During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Acad. Radiol. 2020;27(9):1285-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.06.001

Visccher K, Faden L, Wiseman D. Radiology Exposure in the Undergraduate Curriculum: A Medical Student Perspective on Quality and Opportunities for Positive Change. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2017 Aug;68(3):249-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2016.10.004

Cohen MD, Gunderman RB, Frank MS, Williamson KB. Challenges Facing Radiology Educators. JACR. 2005;2(8):681-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2005.03.008

Newbury A, Cerniglia CA, Lo HS. Implementation of a Novel Hands-on Advanced Radiology Elective. Curr. Probl. Diagn. Radiol. 2021;50(2):123-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.10.012

Wu Y, Theoret C, Burbridge BE. Flipping the Passive Radiology Elective by Including Active Learning. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021;72(4):621-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0846537120953909

Strickland CD, Lowry PA, Petersen BD, Jesse MK. Introduction of a Virtual Workstation Into Radiology Medical Student Education. AJR. 2015;204(3):W289-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.13180

Belfi LM, Dean KE, Jordan SG. I.C.A.R.U.S. in Flight: A Radiology Simulator Teaches Imaging Appropriateness, Anatomy, and Image Interpretation Skills. Acad. Radiol. 2022;29:S94-S102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.03.016

Mauro DM, Ellis JA, Lilly JF, Dallaghan GLB, Jordan SG. Creating an Open-Access Educational Radiology Website for Medical Students: A Guide for Radiology Educators. Acad. Radiol. 2021;28(11):1631-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.08.021

Huang J, Bingham B, Jordanov M. The “Look Ahead” Technique: A Novel Way to Engage Medical Students in the Radiology Reading Room. Acad. Radiol. 2021;28(2):250-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.12.021

Visscher KL, Faden L. Designing a Comprehensive Undergraduate Medical Education Radiology Curriculum Using the 5C’s of Radiology Education Framework. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2018;69(4):362-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2018.06.005

Smith EB, Boscak A, Friedman EM, et al. Radiology Medical Student Education 2020: Surveys of the Alliance of Medical Student Educators in Radiology and Medical Students. Acad Radiol. 2022;29(2):298-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.01.003

Zou L, King A, Soman S, et al. Medical Students’ Preferences in Radiology Education: A Comparison Between the Socratic and Didactic Methods Utilizing PowerPoint Features in Radiology Education. Acad Radiol. 2011;18(2):253-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2010.09.005

Martin J, Fimbres D, Wang S. Prevalence of Novel Pedagogical Methods in the Radiology Education of Medical Students. South Med J. 2022;115(12):874-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001475

PRISMA Flowchart Demonstrating the Selection Process During the Literature Search: A Narrative Review on Quality Improvements for Radiology Clerkships from Medical Student

Downloads

Published

2023-09-14

How to Cite

Chen, S., & Kumaran, M. (2023). A Narrative Review on Quality Improvements for Radiology Clerkships from Medical Student. International Journal of Medical Students, 11(4), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2023.1987

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2023)

Section

Review

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Star Chen, Maruti Kumaran

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site; with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
    2. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
    4. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
    5. The Author represents and warrants that:
      1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
      2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
      3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
      4. the Work has not previously been published;
      5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
      6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
    6. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from the Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Enforcement of copyright

The IJMS takes the protection of copyright very seriously.

If the IJMS discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, the IJMS may bring legal proceedings against you seeking reparation and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.

If you become aware of any use of the IJMS' copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org

 

Infringing material

If you become aware of any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org