Learning of Intimate Area Examination Amongst Pakistani Medical Students: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2024.2219

Keywords:

Clinical Skills, Physical Examination, Medical students, Intimate Area Examination (IAE), Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, Barriers, Undergraduate Training, Cross-Sectional Study, Patient Refusal, Gender Differences , Real Patients, Theoretical Training , Cultural Sensitivity, Supervision , Postgraduate Trainees, Clinical Experience , Pakistan

Abstract

Background: Intimate area examination (IAE) is an integral part of clinical examination skills and must be mastered by medical students before they start their careers. This study explores the experiences of Pakistani medical students regarding learning of IAE, the associated barriers and their effects on students’ learning.

Methods: This cross-sectional study, based on a self-designed questionnaire, was conducted at two Pakistani medical colleges, which included final year students and postgraduate trainees.

Results: During their undergraduate training, 74.9% of the respondents had not conducted a female pelvic examination, 51.9% had not examined a female groin, 79.7% had not examined a female rectum, and 72.7% had not examined a male rectum. From the 65 postgraduate doctors, 48.4% reported that they were not prepared to perform an IAE at the start of their clinical career. Regarding barriers to IAE learning, more than half of the respondents felt that the opposite gender of the patient (64.7%) and patient’s refusal (63.1%) had a strong negative effect on IAE learning. A high percentage of respondents reports that they were not taught IAE during their undergraduate years. Among the currently used pedagogical techniques, 71.1% of the respondents opted for real patient-based learning, followed by clinical simulations (21.9%), and videos (7.0%). No one thought examination should be taught theoretically. A significant difference between male and female experience in IAE learning was also observed.

Conclusion: Learning of IAE remains unsatisfactory and poses a major challenge for the Pakistani Medical Students in the institutes included in this study.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Dabson AM, Magin PJ, Heading G, Pond D. Medical students' experiences learning intimate physical examination skills: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:39.

Jolly BC, Macdonald MM. Education for practice: the role of practical experience in undergraduate and general clinical training. Med Educ. 1989;23(2):189-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1989.tb00885.x

MacLeod SM. Undergraduate medical education. Too many facts not enough innovation. BMJ. 1993;307(6918):1565-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.307.6918.1565-c

Abdulghani HM, Haque S, Irshad M, Al-Zahrani N, Al-Bedaie E, Al-Fahad L, et al. Students' perception and experience of intimate area examination and sexual history taking during undergraduate clinical skills training: A study from two Saudi medical colleges. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(30):e4400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004400

McBain L, Pullon S, Garrett S, Hoare K. Genital examination training: assessing the effectiveness of an integrated female and male teaching programme. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0822-y

Temple-Smith MJ, Mulvey G, Keogh L. Attitudes to taking a sexual history in general practice in Victoria, Australia. Sex Transm Infect. 1999;75(1):41-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.75.1.41

Hay P, Ugwumadu A. Detecting and treating common sexually transmitted diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23(5):647-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.06.008

Géczi L, Horváth Z, Beczássy E, Kisbenedek L, Bak M, Bodrogi I. [Early diagnosis of testicular cancer]. Magy Onkol. 2000;44(4):275-83.

Nguyen HT, Rossini G. Hernia, hydrocele, testicular torsion, and varicocele. InThe Kelalis--King--Belman Textbook of Clinical Pediatric Urology 2018 Sep 3 (pp. 1313-1333). CRC Press.

Johnson CA, James D, Marzan A, Armaos M. Cervical cancer: an overview of pathophysiology and management. In Seminars in oncology nursing 2019 Apr 1 (Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 166-174). WB Saunders. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2019.02.003

Powell HS, Bridge J, Eskesen S, Estrada F, Laya M. Medical students' self-reported experiences performing pelvic, breast, and male genital examinations and the influence of student gender and physician supervision. Acad Med. 2006;81(3):286-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200603000-00022

Menhas R, Umer S. Breast Cancer among Pakistani Women. Iran J Public Health. 2015;44(4):586-7.

Hendrickx K, De Winter BY, Wyndaele JJ, Tjalma WA, Debaene L, Selleslags B, Mast F, Buytaert P, Bossaert L. Intimate examination teaching with volunteers: implementation and assessment at the University of Antwerp. Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct 1;63(1-2):47-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.08.009

Dabson AM, Magin PJ, Heading G, Pond D. Medical students’ experiences learning intimate physical examination skills: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14(1):1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-39

Bolarinwa OA. Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2015;22(4):195-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1117-1936.173959

Feng L, Sajid MJ, Lian Z, Shuqin L. Female gynecologist preference: A viewpoint based on two scenario survey from Pakistan. Int J Res. 2018;5(15):4.

Roter DL, Geller G, Bernhardt BA, Larson SM, Doksum T. Effects of obstetrician gender on communication and patient satisfaction. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(5 Pt 1):635-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-199905000-00001

Derose KP, Hays RD, McCaffrey DF, Baker DW. Does physician gender affect satisfaction of men and women visiting the emergency department? J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(4):218-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016004218.x

Armitage AJ, Cahill DJ. Medical students and intimate examinations: What affects whether a woman will consent? Med Teach. 2018;40(12):1281-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1428736

Padela AI, Rodriguez del Pozo P. Muslim patients and cross-gender interactions in medicine: an Islamic bioethical perspective. J Med Ethics. 2011;37(1):40-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.037614

Vargas EA, Brassel ST, Cortina LM, Settles IH, Johnson TRB, Jagsi R. #MedToo: A Large-Scale Examination of the Incidence and Impact of Sexual Harassment of Physicians and Other Faculty at an Academic Medical Center. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020;29(1):13-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2019.7766

Notaro E, Pascoe V, Shinohara MM, DeNiro K. Sexual harassment from patient to provider. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2020;6(1):30-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2019.09.001

Subhani A, Khan S. Problems faced by male medical students in learning on female subjects. Pak J Physiol. 2007;3(2).

Maan MA, Hussain F, Iqbal J, Akhtar SJ. Sexually transmitted infections in Pakistan. Ann Saudi Med. 2011;31(3):263-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2011.263

DeSipio J, Gaughan J, Perlis S, Phadtare S. Use of Real Patients and Patient-Simulation-Based Methodologies for Teaching Gastroenterology to Pre-Clinical Medical Students. Healthcare (Basel). 2018;6(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare6020061

Diemers AD, Dolmans DH, Verwijnen MG, Heineman E, Scherpbier AJ. Students' opinions about the effects of preclinical patient contacts on their learning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008;13(5):633-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9070-6

Bokken L, Rethans JJ, van Heurn L, Duvivier R, Scherpbier A, van der Vleuten C. Students' views on the use of real patients and simulated patients in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med. 2009;84(7):958-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a814a3

Al-Elq AH. Simulation-based medical teaching and learning. J Family Community Med. 2010;17(1):35-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-1683.68787

2Warner SL, Solomon LJ, Foster RS, Jr., Worden JK, Atkins E. Continuing education in the physician's office: a pilot study for breast exams. Fam Pract Res J. 1993;13(2):179-83.

Günay U, Kılınç G. The transfer of theoretical knowledge to clinical practice by nursing students and the difficulties they experience: A qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;65:81-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.031

This illustration depicts a busy medical scene with various healthcare professionals, including doctors and nurses, engaged in different activities such as examining patients, discussing medical charts, and conducting lab tests. At the bottom, there are detailed illustrations of the female reproductive system, indicating a focus on gynecological or reproductive health.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-07 — Updated on 2024-07-09

How to Cite

Bakhtiari, M., Umar Farooq, R. M., Ijaz, M. T., Shahab, A., & Hameed Daula, M. I. (2024). Learning of Intimate Area Examination Amongst Pakistani Medical Students: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Study. International Journal of Medical Students, 12(2), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2024.2219

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Original Article

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Masooma Bakhtiari, Muhammad Tayyab Ijaz, Rana Muhammad Umar Farooq, Amna Shahab, Muhammad Imran Hameed Daula

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site; with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
    2. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
    4. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
    5. The Author represents and warrants that:
      1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
      2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
      3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
      4. the Work has not previously been published;
      5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
      6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
    6. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from the Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Enforcement of copyright

The IJMS takes the protection of copyright very seriously.

If the IJMS discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, the IJMS may bring legal proceedings against you seeking reparation and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.

If you become aware of any use of the IJMS' copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org

 

Infringing material

If you become aware of any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org

Most read articles by the same author(s)