Sculpting the Science: Teaching Anatomy of the Facial Muscles to Medical Students

Authors

Keywords:

clay-modelling, Anatomy education, Practical, Facial muscles

Abstract

Background:Clay-modeling in anatomy education is an engaging activity that complements cadaveric dissections. The post-COVID-19 cadaver shortage further necessitates alternative practical modalities.

Methods:A student-centred clay-modeling practical activity was developed towards the study of the muscles of facial expression due to a shortage of cadaveric material. Student feedback in the form of a questionnaire with closed- and open-ended questions.

Results:Thematic analysis was manually performed to generate the primary and secondary themes associated with the open-ended questions. Four themes were generated: fun, collaboration, active learning, and bittersweet. Closed-ended questions revealed that respondents found the activity motivational and enjoyable. Feeling around the disassembly of students' anatomical models was of particular interest. Some students expressed emotions of sadness and others stated that they felt devastated.

Conclusion:The outcome of this study presents the opportunity for further work to link discussions around the humanistic considerations of anatomy and the study of human remains, utilizing clay modelling as a crucial resource.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Cotofana, S. & Lachman, N. Anatomy of the Facial Fat Compartments and their Relevance in Aesthetic Surgery. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 17, 399–413 (2019).

Kooloos, J. G. M., Schepens-Franke, A. N., Bergman, E. M., Donders, R. A. R. T. & Vorstenbosch, M. A. T. M. Anatomical knowledge gain through a clay-modeling exercise compared to live and video observations. Anat Sci Educ 7, 420–429 (2014).

Talmor, M., Hoffman, L. A. & LaTrenta, G. S. Facial atrophy in HIV-related fat redistribution syndrome: anatomic evaluation and surgical reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 49, 11–18 (2002).

Correia, J. C., Baatjes, K. J. & Meyer, I. Student-Perceived Value on the Use of Clay Modelling in Undergraduate Clinical Anatomy. Adv Exp Med Biol 1388, 153–170 (2022).

Bell, L. T. O. & Evans, D. J. R. Art, anatomy, and medicine: Is there a place for art in medical education? Anat Sci Educ 7, 370–378 (2014).

Aboud, E., Suarez, C. E., Al-Mefty, O. & Yasargil, M. G. New alternative to animal models for surgical training. Altern Lab Anim 32 Suppl 1B, 501–507 (2004).

Ghosh, S. K. Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st century. Anat Sci Educ 10, 286–299 (2017).

Nicholson, L. L., Reed, D. & Chan, C. An interactive, multi-modal Anatomy workshop improves academic performance in the health sciences: a cohort study. BMC Med Educ 16, (2016).

Oh, C.-S., Kim, J.-Y. & Choe, Y. H. Learning of cross-sectional anatomy using clay models. Anat Sci Educ 2, 156–159 (2009).

Remmele, M. & Martens, A. Using stereoscopic visualizations as templates to construct a spatial hands-on representation-is there a novelty effect? Adv Physiol Educ 43, 93–98 (2019).

Motoike, H. K., O’Kane, R. L., Lenchner, E. & Haspel, C. Clay modeling as a method to learn human muscles: A community college study. Anat Sci Educ 2, 19–23 (2009).

Burnard, P., Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E. & Chadwick, B. Analysing and presenting qualitative data. Br Dent J 204, 429–432 (2008).

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3, 77–101 (2006).

Radzi, S. et al. Students’ learning experiences of three-dimensional printed models and plastinated specimens: a qualitative analysis. BMC Med Educ 22, 1–10 (2022).

Joffe, H. Thematic Analysis. Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy: A Guide for Students and Practitioners 209–223 (2011) doi:10.1002/9781119973249.CH15.

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 11, 589–597 (2019).

DeHoff, M. E., Clark, K. L. & Meganathan, K. Learning outcomes and student-perceived value of clay modeling and cat dissection in undergraduate human anatomy and physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 35, 68–75 (2011).

Curlewis, K., Leung, B., Perera, M., Bazira, P. J. & Sanders, K. A. Clay-Based Modeling in the Anatomist’s Toolkit: A Systematic Review. Anat Sci Educ 14, 252–262 (2021).

Akle, V., Peña-Silva, R. A., Valencia, D. M. & Rincón-Perez, C. W. Validation of clay modeling as a learning tool for the periventricular structures of the human brain. Anat Sci Educ 11, 137–145 (2018).

Chong, W., Tran, N. & Bui, A. Effectiveness of a Clay Pelvic Model: A Hands-on Approach to Understanding Pelvic Floor Anatomy. Obstetrics and gynecology 140, 94–98 (2022).

Drake, R. L., McBride, J. M., Lachman, N. & Pawlina, W. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: the winds of change continue to blow. Anat Sci Educ 2, 253–259 (2009).

Ahmed, K. et al. Specialist anatomy: Is the structure of teaching adequate? The Surgeon 9, 312–317 (2011).

Liu, L., Arnold, R. & Robinson, M. Dissection and exposure of the whole course of deep nerves in human head specimens after decalcification. Int J Otolaryngol 2012, 1–7 (2012).

Pawlina, W. Professionalism and anatomy: How do these two terms define our role? Clin Anat 19, 391–392 (2006).

Laakkonen, J. & Muukkonen, H. Fostering Students’ Collaborative Learning Competencies and Professional Conduct in the Context of Two Gross Anatomy Courses in Veterinary Medicine. Anat Sci Educ 12, 154–163 (2019).

Dueñas, A. N., Kirkness, K. & Finn, G. M. Uncovering Hidden Curricula: Use of Dark Humor in Anatomy Labs and its Implications for Basic Sciences Education. Med Sci Educ 30, 345–354 (2020).

Dinsmore, C. E., Daugherty, S. & Zeitz, H. J. Student responses to the gross anatomy laboratory in a medical curriculum. Clin Anat 14, 231–236 (2001).

Talarico, E. F. A change in paradigm: giving back identity to donors in the anatomy laboratory. Clin Anat 26, 161–172 (2013).

Williams, A. D., Greenwald, E. E., Soricelli, R. L. & DePace, D. M. Medical students’ reactions to anatomic dissection and the phenomenon of cadaver naming. Anat Sci Educ 7, 169–180 (2014).

Ferguson, K. J., Iverson, W. & Pizzimenti, M. Constructing Stories of Past Lives: Cadaver as First Patient: “Clinical Summary of Dissection” Writing Assignment for Medical Students. Perm J 12, 89–92 (2008).

Tuohimaa, P., Tamminen, T. & Fabrin, V. Is it appropriate to speak of death during a dissection course? http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10401339309539613 5, 169–173 (2009).

Rizzolo, L. J. Human dissection: an approach to interweaving the traditional and humanistic goals of medical education. Anat Rec 269, 242–248 (2002).

Downloads

Published

2025-03-27

How to Cite

Chiappini, T., Correia, J. C., Taylor, A. M., van der Merwe, J., & Wessels, Q. (2025). Sculpting the Science: Teaching Anatomy of the Facial Muscles to Medical Students. International Journal of Medical Students. Retrieved from https://ijms.info/IJMS/article/view/2564

Issue

Forthcoming

Section

Original Article

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Toni Chiappini, Janine C Correia, Adam M Taylor, Jan van der Merwe, Quenton Wessels

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site; with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
    2. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
    4. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
    5. The Author represents and warrants that:
      1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
      2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
      3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
      4. the Work has not previously been published;
      5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
      6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
    6. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from the Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Enforcement of copyright

The IJMS takes the protection of copyright very seriously.

If the IJMS discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, the IJMS may bring legal proceedings against you seeking reparation and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.

If you become aware of any use of the IJMS' copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org

 

Infringing material

If you become aware of any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org