Common ECG Lead Placement Errors. Part I: Limb lead Reversals

  • Allison V. Rosen Queen’s University School of Medicine, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
  • Sahil Koppikar Department of Internal Medicine, Kingston General Hospital, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
  • Catherine Shaw Heart Rhythm Service, Kingston General Hospital, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
  • Adrian Baranchuk Heart Rhythm Service, Kingston General Hospital, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Keywords: Cardiology,, Electrocardiography, Medical Errors, Limb Lead Reversal, Medical Education

Abstract

Background: Electrocardiography is a very useful diagnostic tool. However, errors in placement of ECG leads can create artifacts, mimic pathologies, and hinder proper ECG interpretation. This is the second of a two-part series discussing how to recognize and avoid these errors. Methods: 12-lead ECGs were recorded in a single male healthy subject in his mid 20s. Various precordial lead misplacements were compared to ECG recordings from correct lead placement. Results: Precordial misplacements caused classical changes in ECG patterns. Techniques of differentiating these ECG patterns from true pathological findings were described. Conclusion: As in Part I of this series, recognition and interpretation of common ECG placement errors is critical in providing optimal patient care.

Author Biography

Allison V. Rosen, Queen’s University School of Medicine, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Allison Rosen is currently in her third year of medical school at Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada. She is the Editor-in-Chief of the Queen’s Medical Review and an active member of the Class Council.

References

1. Pérez-Riera AR, Barbosa-Barros R, Baranchuk A. Current value of the elec¬trocardiogram in the 21st century. Austin J Clin Cardiolog. 2014 Feb 24;1(2):1- 3.
2. Mason JW, Hancock EW, Gettes LS, et al. Recommendations for the stan¬dardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: Part II: Electrocar¬diography diagnostic statement list a scientific statement from the American heart association electrocardiography and arrhythmias committee, council on clinical cardiology; the American college of cardiology foundation; and the heart rhythm society endorsed by the international society for computerized electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Mar 13;49(10):1128-35.
3. Kligfield P. Gettes LS. Bailey JJ, et al. American Heart Association Elec¬trocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee,Council on Clinical Cardiology. American College of Cardiology Foundation.Heart Rhythm Society. Recom¬mendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardio¬gram: Part I: The electrocardiogram and its technology a scientific statement from the american heart association electrocardiography and arrhythmias committee, council on clinical cardiology; the american college of cardio¬logy foundation; and the heart rhythm society endorsed by the internatio¬nal society for computerized electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Mar 13;49(10):1109-27.
4. Rajaganeshan R, Ludlam CL, Francis DP, Parasramka SV, Sutton R. Accuracy in ECG lead placement among technicians, nurses, general physicians and cardiologists. Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Jan;62(1):65-70.
5. Sejersten M, Pahlm O, Pettersson J, et al. Comparison of EASI-derived 12-lead electrocardiograms versus paramedic-acquired 12-lead electrocardio¬grams using mason-likar limb lead configuration in patients with chest pain. J Electrocardiol. 2006 Jan;39(1):13-21.
6. Hoffman I. Einthoven's left foot: A plea for disciplined electrode place¬ment. J Electrocardiol. 2008 May-Jun;41(3):205-6.
7. Baranchuk A, Shaw C, Alanazi H, et al. Electrocardiography pitfalls and artifacts: The 10 commandments. Crit Care Nurse. 2009 Feb;29(1):67-73.
8. Koppikar S, Shaw C, Baranchunk A. ECG quiz: A tale of an abnormal ECG. J Electrocardiol. 2014 Jan-Feb;47(1):123-5.
9. Rudiger A, Hellermann JP, Mukherjee R, Follath F, Turina J. Electrocardiogra¬phic artifacts due to electrode misplacement and their frequency in different clinical settings. Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Feb;25(2):174-8.
10. Batchvarov VN, Malik M, Camm AJ. Incorrect electrode cable connection
during electrocardiographic recording. Europace. 2007 Nov;9(11):1081-90.
11. Knight BP, Pelosi F, Michaud GF, Strickberger SA, Morady F. Clinical conse¬quences of electrocardiographic artifact mimicking ventricular tachycardia. N Engl J Med. 1999 1000 Oct 21;341(17):1270-4.
12. Harrigan R, Chan T, Brady W. Diagnosis: Limb electrode reversal. Emergen¬cy Medicine News. 2004 Jun;26(6):18-20.
13. Garcia-Niebla J, Llontop-Garcia P, Valle-Racero JI, Serra-Autonell G, Batchva¬rov VN, de Luna AB. Technical mistakes during the acquisition of the electro-cardiogram. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology. 2009 Oct;14(4):389-403.
14. Report of committee on electrocardiography, american heart association. Recommendations for standardization of leads and of specifications for ins-truments in electrocardiography and vectorcardiography. Circulation. 1967 Mar;35(3):583-602.
15. Drew BJ. Pitfalls and artifacts in electrocardiography. Cardiol Clin. 2006 vii; Aug;24(3):309-15.
16. Peberdy MA, Ornato JP. Recognition of electrocardiographic lead mispla¬cements. Am J Emerg Med. 1993 Jul;11(4):403-5.
17. Abdollah H, Milliken JA. Recognition of electrocardiographic left arm/left leg lead reversal. Am J Cardiol. 1997 Nov 1;80(9):1247-9.
18. Ho KK, Ho SK. Use of the sinus P wave in diagnosing electrocardiographic limb lead misplacement not involving the right leg (ground) lead. J Electro¬cardiol. 2001 Apr;34(2):161-71.
19. Eisenberg MJ, de Romeral LM, Heidenreich PA, Schiller NB, Evans GT Jr. The diagnosis of pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade by 12-lead ECG. A technology assessment. Chest. 1996 Aug;110(2):318-24.
20. de Voogt WG, van Mechelen R, Scheffer M, van Miltenburg van Zijl AJ, Elhendy AA. Electrocardiographic characteristics in low atrial septum pacing. J Electrocardiol. 2005 Apr;38(2):166-70.
21. Hoffman I. A flatline lead I results from bilateral arm-to-leg electrode exchange. J Electrocardiol. 2008 Sep-Oct;41(5):388-90.
22. Srikureja W, Darbar D, Reeder GS. Tremor-induced ECG artifact mimicking ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2000 Sep 12;102(11):1337-8.
23. Knight BP, Pelosi F, Michaud GF, Strickberger SA, Morady F. Physician inter¬pretation of electrocardiographic artifact that mimics ventricular tachycardia. Am J Med. 2001 Apr 1;110(5):335-8.
24. Wieters JS, Carlin JP, Morris A. Case report: An electrocardiogram of spon¬taneous pneumothorax mimicking arm lead reversal. J Emerg Med. 2014 May;46(5):620-3.
Published
2014-09-03
How to Cite
V. Rosen, A., Koppikar, S., Shaw, C., & Baranchuk, A. (2014). Common ECG Lead Placement Errors. Part I: Limb lead Reversals. International Journal of Medical Students, 2(3), 92-98. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2014.95
Section
Original Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)