This is an outdated version published on 2022-09-30. Read the most recent version.

Satisfaction of Medical Students with Surgical Training: A Survey of Northern Italy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2022.1450

Keywords:

Surgical Procedures, Operative, Education, Medical, Survey

Abstract

Background: Medical student satisfaction regarding the inclusion of surgical education into the medical curriculum may vary among learners. In this study, we analyzed the satisfaction of medical students in regard to how surgical topics were taught in Italian schools in 2021 through a survey. The results collected can be used to not only improve the quality of medical education in the future but to help students make informed decisions about their own education.

Methods: An electronic survey was sent out to medical students in their third to sixth years across three medical schools in Northern Italy via their respective institutional secretaries. The questionnaire was available in Italian and English. It included both closed and open-ended questions regarding satisfaction with the teaching of surgical topics in Italian medical universities.

Results: Results were reported following the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Most respondents (87%) preferred to have an increase in surgery-related electives and/or extracurricular courses. Further, 51.2% of respondents expressed an increased interest in surgery after having observed in the Operating Room (OR). The majority of respondents (73.3%) also expressed that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had negatively impacted the quality of teaching of surgical topics.

Conclusion: In the present survey study, Italian medical students preferred hands-on practice over theoretical lectures for surgical education. The majority of students stipulated that the inclusion of suturing, scrubbing, and good surgical practice workshops along with an increased OR attendance would facilitate a better understanding of surgery. 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Rassbach CE, Blankenburg R. A Novel Pediatric Residency Coaching Program. Academic Medicine. 2018 Mar;93(3):430–4.

Wittich CM, Agrawal A, Wang AT, Halvorsen AJ, Mandrekar JN, Chaudhry S, et al. Flipped Classrooms in Graduate Medical Education. Academic Medicine. 2018 Mar;93(3):471–7.

Magistri P, Nigri G, Petrucciani N, Aurello P, D’Angelo F, Ramacciato G. Comparison of multiple training models of surgical rotation for third-year medical students A prospective study. Ann Ital Chir. 2016;87:177–82.

al Shanafey S, Alzahrani A, AlBallaa A, Alballaa A. Surgical resident satisfaction with the current surgical training program in the Riyadh area. Ann Saudi Med. 2009 Sep;29(5):388–92.

Aldossary MY, Alnaimi M, Almabyouq F, Alsofyani T, AlJahdali A, Al-Buainain H. Resident satisfaction regarding surgical training programme in Eastern Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Surgery Open. 2019;17:15–9.

Casacchia M, Cifone MG, Giusti L, Fabiani L, Gatto R, Lancia L, et al. Distance education during COVID 19: an Italian survey on the university teachers’ perspectives and their emotional conditions. BMC Med Educ. 2021 Dec 9;21(1):335.

Coleman JR, Abdelsattar JM, Glocker RJ, Carmichael H, Vigneshwar NG, Ryan R, et al. COVID-19 Pandemic and the Lived Experience of Surgical Residents, Fellows, and Early-Career Surgeons in the American College of Surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Feb;232(2):119-135e20.

Hau HM, Weitz J, Bork U. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Student and Resident Teaching and Training in Surgical Oncology. J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 26;9(11):3431.

Co M, Cheung KYC, Cheung WS, Fok HM, Fong KH, Kwok OY, et al. Distance education for anatomy and surgical training – A systematic review. The Surgeon. 2021 Sep;

Yaddanapudi S, Yaddanapudi L. How to design a questionnaire. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63(5):335.

Rattray J, Jones MC. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. J Clin Nurs. 2007 Feb;16(2):234–43.

Eysenbach G. Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 29;6(3):e34.

Crutzen R, Ygram Peters GJ, Mondschein C. Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychol Health. 2019 Nov 2;34(11):1347–57.

Parini S, Lucidi D, Azzolina D, Verdi D, Frigerio I, Gumbs AA, et al. Women in Surgery Italia: National Survey Assessing Gender-Related Challenges. J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Nov;233(5):583–92.

Kim TK. T test as a parametric statistic. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015;68(6):540.

Neylan CJ, Nelson EF, Dumon KR, Morris JB, Williams NN, Dempsey DT, et al. Medical School Surgical Boot Camps: A Systematic Review. J Surg Educ. 2017 May;74(3):384–9.

Ricci L, Lanfranchi JB, Lemetayer F, Rotonda C, Guillemin F, Coste J, et al. Qualitative Methods Used to Generate Questionnaire Items: A Systematic Review. Qual Health Res. 2019 Jan 28;29(1):149–56.

Brasel K, Haider A, Haukoos J. Practical Guide to Survey Research. JAMA Surg. 2020 Apr 1;155(4):351.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-08 — Updated on 2022-09-30

Versions

How to Cite

Azevedo Sansoni, G., Borzi, P., Karki, P., Khan Sajid, S., Semikhnenko, A., & Varma, A. (2022). Satisfaction of Medical Students with Surgical Training: A Survey of Northern Italy . International Journal of Medical Students, 10(3), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2022.1450 (Original work published September 28, 2022)

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 3 (2022)

Section

Short Communication

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Gabriela Azevedo Sansoni , Patrizia Borzi, Preetha Karki, Shahzeen Khan Sajid , Anastasia Semikhnenko, Aswathy Varma

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site; with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
    2. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
    4. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
    5. The Author represents and warrants that:
      1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
      2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
      3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
      4. the Work has not previously been published;
      5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
      6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
    6. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from the Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Enforcement of copyright

The IJMS takes the protection of copyright very seriously.

If the IJMS discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, the IJMS may bring legal proceedings against you seeking reparation and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.

If you become aware of any use of the IJMS' copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org

 

Infringing material

If you become aware of any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org

Most read articles by the same author(s)