Accuracy and Precision of Actigraphy and SMARTwheels for Measuring Push Counts Across a Series of Wheelchair Propulsion Trials in Non-disabled Young Adults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2023.1950Keywords:
Wheelchair, Actigraphy, Physical Activity, Health Promotion, DisabilityAbstract
Background: There has been a growing interest in “Lifestyle Physical Activity” (LPA) among wheelchair users. LPA can be quantified via “pushes” as an outcome metric. This study examined the accuracy and precision of research-grade devices for counting pushes across a series of wheelchair propulsion trials.
Methods: Eleven non-disabled, young adults completed 19, 1-minute wheelchair propulsion trials at self-selected speeds with a wheelchair equipped with a SMARTwheel (SW) device while being video recorded. Participants also wore 2 ActiGraph accelerometers, one on the wrist and one on the upper arm. Video footage enabled manual counting of the number of pushes (gold standard). Total pushes were averaged across 16 workloads (3 trials of repeated workloads were excluded) for each device and compared to manually counted pushes.
Results: Compared to manually counted pushes, SW demonstrated the greatest accuracy (mean difference [MD] compared to video of 2.3 pushes [4.5% error]) and precision (standard deviation of the mean difference [SDMD]) compared to video of 4 pushes, (Coefficient of Variation [CV] =.04), followed by the upper arm-worn accelerometer (MD of 4.4 pushes [10.4% error] and SDMD of 10, [CV= .06]) and the wrist-worn accelerometer (MD of 12.6 pushes [27.8% error] and SDMD of 13 [CV=.15]).
Conclusions: SW demonstrated greater accuracy and precision than ActiGraph accelerometers placed on the upper arm and wrist. The accelerometer placed on the upper arm was more accurate and precise than the accelerometer placed on the wrist. Future investigations should be conducted to identify the source(s) of inaccuracy among wearable push counters.
Metrics
References
Cowan RE, Silveira SL, Helle T, Laessoe U, Goeg KR, Bangshaab J, et al. Lifestyle physical activity in manual wheelchair users - an overlooked public health opportunity. Spinal Cord. 2022;60(2):190-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-021-00729-y
Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, et al. The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 2018;320(19):2020-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.14854
Klaren RE, Motl RW, Dlugonski D, Sandroff BM, Pilutti LA. Objectively quantified physical activity in persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(12):2342-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.011
Motl RW, McAuley E, Snook EM. Physical activity and multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Mult Scler. 2005;11(4):459-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1352458505ms1188oa
Motl RW. Lifestyle physical activity in persons with multiple sclerosis: the new kid on the MS block. Mult Scler. 2014;20(8):1025-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458514525873
Buchholz AC, McGillivray CF, Pencharz PB. Physical activity levels are low in free-living adults with chronic paraplegia. Obes Res. 2003;11(4):563-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2003.79
Cooper RA. SMARTWheel: From concept to clinical practice. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009;33(3):198-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03093640903082126
Benning NH, Knaup, Petra, Rupp, Rudiger. Comparison of accuracy of activity measurements with wearable activity trackers in wheelchair users: a preliminary evaluation. GMS Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie. 2020;16(2).
Benning NH, Knaup P, Rupp R. Measurement Performance of Activity Measurements with Newer Generation of Apple Watch in Wheelchair Users with Spinal Cord Injury. Methods Inf Med. 2021;60(S 02):e103-e10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740236
Glasheen E, Domingo A, Kressler J. Accuracy of Apple Watch fitness tracker for wheelchair use varies according to movement frequency and task. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021;64(1):101382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2020.03.007
Karinharju KS, Boughey AM, Tweedy SM, Clanchy KM, Trost SG, Gomersall SR. Validity of the Apple Watch((R)) for monitoring push counts in people using manual wheelchairs. J Spinal Cord Med. 2021;44(2):212-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2019.1576444
DeVivo MJ, Krause JS, Lammertse DP. Recent trends in mortality and causes of death among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(11):1411-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90252-6
Lemons VR, Wagner FC, Jr. Respiratory complications after cervical spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(20):2315-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199410150-00011
Tollefsen E, Fondenes O. Respiratory complications associated with spinal cord injury. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2012;132(9):1111-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.10.0922
Veeger HE, Meershoek LS, van der Woude LH, Langenhoff JM. Wrist motion in handrim wheelchair propulsion. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1998;35(3):305-13.
Koontz AM, Cooper RA, Boninger ML, Yang Y, Impink BG, van der Woude LH. A kinetic analysis of manual wheelchair propulsion during start-up on select indoor and outdoor surfaces. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(4):447-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2004.08.0106
Rammer JR, Krzak JJ, Slavens BA, Winters JM, Riedel SA, Harris GF. Considering Propulsion Pattern in Therapeutic Outcomes for Children Who Use Manual Wheelchairs. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2019;31(4):360-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000649
Rankin JW, Kwarciak AM, Richter WM, Neptune RR. The influence of wheelchair propulsion technique on upper extremity muscle demand: a simulation study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012;27(9):879-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.07.002
Sanderson DJ, Sommer HJ, 3rd. Kinematic features of wheelchair propulsion. J Biomech. 1985;18(6):423-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(85)90277-5
de Groot S, Vegter RJ, van der Woude LH. Effect of wheelchair mass, tire type and tire pressure on physical strain and wheelchair propulsion technique. Med Eng Phys. 2013;35(10):1476-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.03.019
van Drongelen S, Arnet U, Veeger DH, van der Woude LH. Effect of workload setting on propulsion technique in handrim wheelchair propulsion. Med Eng Phys. 2013;35(3):283-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.04.017
Veeger HE, van der Woude LH, Rozendal RH. Load on the upper extremity in manual wheelchair propulsion. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1991;1(4):270-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/1050-6411(91)90014-V
Veeger HE, van der Woude LH, Rozendal RH. Effect of handrim velocity on mechanical efficiency in wheelchair propulsion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;24(1):100-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-199201000-00017
Bertolaccini GDS, Carvalho Filho IFP, Christofoletti G, Paschoarelli LC, Medola FO. The influence of axle position and the use of accessories on the activity of upper limb muscles during manual wheelchair propulsion. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018;24(2):311-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2017.1294369
Fritsch C. How Was Studied the Effect of Manual Wheelchair Configuration on Propulsion Biomechanics: A Systematic Review on Methodologies. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Services. 2022;3:863113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.863113
Klaesner J, Morgan KA, Gray DB. The development of an instrumented wheelchair propulsion testing and training device. Assist Technol. 2014;26(1):24-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2013.792020
Gauthier C, Grangeon M, Ananos L, Brosseau R, Gagnon DH. Quantifying cardiorespiratory responses resulting from speed and slope increments during motorized treadmill propulsion among manual wheelchair users. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;60(5):281-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2017.02.007
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hunter Soleymani, Brenda Jeng, Beshoy Abdelmessih, Rachel Cowan, Robert W. Motl
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site; with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from the Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Enforcement of copyright
The IJMS takes the protection of copyright very seriously.
If the IJMS discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, the IJMS may bring legal proceedings against you seeking reparation and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.
If you become aware of any use of the IJMS' copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org
Infringing material
If you become aware of any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org