A Narrative Review of Women in Medicine Interest Groups at the Pre-Medical, Graduate, and Post-Graduate Medical Education Levels

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2023.2281

Keywords:

Toolkit, Women, Medicine, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Pre-Medical, Graduate, Medical Education, Interest Groups

Abstract

Women in Medicine (WIM) interest groups can provide collaboration and support for the professional development of women as they navigate the gender inequities that persist in the healthcare workplace. This narrative review assesses successful methods used by multiple institutions to form groups and toolkits catered to women's empowerment. Medical career education was stratified into three levels: Pre-Medical, Graduate, and Post-graduate Medical Education. A keyword literature search on peer-reviewed platforms including Google Scholar, PubMed, OVID, EBSCO, and gray literature (i.e. medical societies toolkits) was used to identify applicable articles. We aimed to develop a toolkit derived from literature findings consisting of a list of ten steps for creating and maintaining a successful WIM group based on successful measures reported in the literature. Twenty-three studies were selected after screening using the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA). Data extraction was conducted systematically by three researchers who independently reviewed and documented key information from selected studies. Our analysis identified common success factors across all educational levels, including mentorship, adequate resources, administrative support, networking opportunities, and safe spaces as critical elements for women's career advancement in medicine. Based on these findings, we developed a comprehensive ten-step toolkit for institutions seeking to establish or improve their WIM groups. These implications extend beyond individual career advancement to institutional transformation and patient care improvement. Future research should focus on longitudinal outcome measures to evaluate the long-term impact of these interventions on career trajectories, leadership representation, and organizational climate change.

References

1. Bauman Bauman MD, Howell LP, Villablanca AC. The Women in Medicine and Health Science program: an innovative initiative to support female faculty at the University of California Davis School of Medicine. Acad Med. 2014;89(11):1462–1466.

2. Boyle P. Nation's Physician Workforce Evolves: More Women, a Bit Older, and toward Different Specialties. AAMC. 2021 Feb 2. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/nation-s-physician-workforce-evolves-more-women-bit-older-and-toward-different-specialties

3. Mangurian C, Linos E, Sarkar U, Rodriguez C, Jagsi R. What's Holding Women in Medicine Back from Leadership. Harvard Business Review. 2018 Nov 7. Available from: https://hbr.org/2018/06/whats-holding-women-in-medicine-back-from-leadership

4. Lautenberger D, Raezer C, Bunton S. The underrepresentation of women in leadership positions at U.S. medical schools. AAMC Analysis in Brief. 2015;15(2). Available from: https://www.aamc.org/data/aib/425010/february2015.html

5. Jagsi R, Guancial EA, Worobey CC, Henault LE, Chang Y, Starr R, et al. The gender gap in authorship of academic medical literature—A 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(3):281–287.

6. Butkus R, Serchen J, Moyer DV, Bornstein SS, Hingle ST, Health and Public Policy Committee of the American College of Physicians, et al. Achieving gender equity in physician compensation and career advancement: A position paper of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168(10):721–723.

7. Berg S. Challenges Faced by Women Physicians Don't Disappear with Age. American Medical Association. 2020 Jun 16. Available from: https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/health-equity/challenges-faced-women-physicians-don-t-disappear-age

8. Shillcutt SK, Parangi S, Diekman S, et al. Survey of women physicians’ experience with elected leadership positions. Health Equity. 2019;3:162–168.

9. Kilminster S, Downes J, Gough B, Murdoch-Eaton D, Roberts T. Women in medicine—is there a problem? A literature review of the changing gender composition, structures and occupational cultures in medicine. Med Educ. 2007;41(1):39–49.

10. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol Int. 2011;31(11):1409–1417.

11. Penny M, Jeffries R, Grant J, Davies SC. Women and academic medicine: a review of the evidence on female representation. J R Soc Med. 2014;107(7):259–263.

12. Gautam M. Women in medicine: stresses and solutions. West J Med. 2001;174(1):37–41.

13. Grace MK. Parting ways: Sex-based differences in premedical attrition. Soc Sci Med. 2019;230:222–233.

14. Rosenthal L, Levy SR, London B, Lobel M, Bazile C. In pursuit of the MD: The impact of role models, identity compatibility, and belonging among undergraduate women. Sex Roles. 2013;68(7–8):464–473.

15. Berge J, Macheledt K, Watson S, Dorr H, et al. Using a community-based participatory approach to address gender equity in academic medicine: The Center for Women in Medicine and Science at the University of Minnesota. Acad Med. 2021. Advance online publication.

16. Helitzer DL, Newbill SL, Cardinali G, Morahan PS, Chang S, Magrane D. Narratives of participants in national career development programs for women in academic medicine: identifying the opportunities for strategic investment. J Womens Health. 2016;25(4):360–370.

17. Choo EK, Kass D, Westergaard M, Watts SH, Berwald N, Regan L, et al. Best practice recommendations to support the hiring, recruitment, and advancement of women physicians in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23(11):1203–1209.

18. Santhosh L, Harleman E, Venado A, Farrand E, Gilbreth ME, Keenan BP, et al. Strategies for forming effective women's groups. Clin Teach. 2021;18(2):126–130.

19. Ibrahim H, Stadler DJ, Archuleta S, Anglade P, Cofrancesco J Jr. Twelve tips for developing and running a successful women's group in international academic medicine. Med Teach. 2019;41(11):1239–1244.

20. Hinson HE, Gonzales NR. On increasing the visibility of women and other groups underrepresented in medicine: To be it, you must see it. Neurology. 2020;95(22):991–992.

21. Singhal D, Bank AM, Poorman JA, Doshi TL, Parekh R, Parangi S, et al. Representation of women plenary speakers at the American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting. Neurology. 2020;95(22):e3045–e3059.

22. Zhong L, Lee K, Baggstrom MQ, Bhayani RK. Investing in women trainees: Building a Women in Medicine Group at an academic institution. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e47783.

23. Pérez-Sánchez S, Madueño SE, Montaner J. Gender gap in the leadership of health institutions: The influence of hospital-level factors. Health Equity. 2021;5(1):521–525.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-28

How to Cite

Bhagudas, S., Crump, A., Azevedo Sansoni, G., Kays, M., Jain, S., & Bhayani, R. (2025). A Narrative Review of Women in Medicine Interest Groups at the Pre-Medical, Graduate, and Post-Graduate Medical Education Levels. International Journal of Medical Students. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2023.2281

Issue

Section

Review

Categories