The Life of an Editor: Dr. Russell Van Gelder, MD, Ph.D., Editor in Chief of Ophthalmology, the Journal of the American Academy of Ophthalmology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2023.2450Keywords:
Editorial training for clinical journal editors, Quality and integrity in medical publications, Impact of biased reporting on patient well-being, Fraud in clinical trials, Role of an editor as a detector and gatekeeper, Responsibilities of medical journal editors, Editorial positions and training, Role of an Editor in Chief, Curatorial role of an editor, Selection of research papers for publication, Editorial decision-making, Handling rejected papers and Nobel Prize-winning research, Editor's responsibility in ensuring content quality, Editorial process and manuscript assessment, Role of reviewers in the editorial process, Interview-based article format, Dr. Russell Van Gelder's role and experiences, Innovations in journal publishing (journal club, social media presence, podcasts), Associate Editors' responsibilities and expertise, Editorial team dynamics and journal family collaborationAbstract
In this insightful interview article, we delve into the life and role of Dr. Russell Van Gelder, MD, Ph.D., Chair of the Ophthalmology Department at the University of Washington and Editor in Chief of Ophthalmology, the Journal of the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Driven by a profound passion for literature, he emphasizes the enduring impact of scientific publications as fundamental to knowledge. He views curating this literature as a privileged responsibility, ensuring its enduring quality. Dr. Van Gelder acknowledges the complexities of predictive editing and the challenges of identifying impactful papers. He let us dig into the editorial process at Ophthalmology as we learn about its rigor, involving meticulous screening, comprehensive reviews, and constructive feedback. For aspiring editors, he underscores the importance of a genuine love for literature and the value of constructive criticism. Dr. Van Gelder addresses common misconceptions about the editor's role, highlights the ethical aspects of publishing, and advocates for a focus on content quality, especially in a world marked by predatory practices. He shares a memorable encounter with the work of Clyde Keeler, a scientist from the early 20th century, underlining the timeless nature of literature as a repository of knowledge that transcends generations. In essence, Russ, as affectionately referred to by colleagues, offers a deep understanding of the life of an editor dedicated to preserving the integrity and excellence of scientific publications in the field of ophthalmology. His perspective is distinctively important for medical students and early careers physicians, underscoring the crucial role that editors play in the advancement of scientific knowledge.
Metrics
References
Schulman K, Sulmasy DP, Roney D. Ethics, Economics, and the Publication Policies of Major Medical Journals. JAMA. 1994;272(2):154–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.272.2.154
Liesegang TJ, Albert DM, Schachat AP, Minckler DS. The editorial process for medical journals: I. Introduction of a series and discussion of the responsibilities of editors, authors, and reviewers. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136(1):109–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(02)02272-9
Callaham ML, Baxt WG, Waeckerle JF, Wears RL. Reliability of editors’ subjective quality ratings of peer reviews of manuscripts. JAMA. 1998;280(3):229–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.229
Hébert PC. Even an editor needs an editor: reflections after five years at CMAJ. CMAJ. 2011;183(17):1951–1951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.111641
Galipeau J, Moher D, Campbell C, Hendry P, Cameron DW, Palepu A, et al. A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(3):257–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.024
George SL, Buyse M. Data fraud in clinical trials. Clin Investig (Lond). 2015;5(2):161–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4155/cli.14.116
Habermann B, Broome M, Pryor ER, Ziner KW. Research Coordinators Experiences with Scientific Misconduct and Research Integrity. Nurs Res. 2010;59(1):51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181c3b9f2
National Academy of Sciences (US), National Academy of Engineering (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Ensuring the Utility and Integrity of Research Data in a Digital Age. Ensuring the Integrity, Accessibility, and Stewardship of Research Data in the Digital Age. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2009.
Van Gelder RN. The Pros and Cons of Artificial Intelligence Authorship in Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2023;130(7):670–1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.05.018
Daniel T. Baldassarre. What’s the Deal with Birds?. Sci J Research & Rev. 2020; 2(3).
Keeler CE. The geotropic reaction of rodless mice in light and in darkness J Gen Physiol. 1928;11(4):361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.11.4.361
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Malina Cernatescu, Francisco J. Bonilla-Escobar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site; with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from the Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Enforcement of copyright
The IJMS takes the protection of copyright very seriously.
If the IJMS discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, the IJMS may bring legal proceedings against you seeking reparation and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.
If you become aware of any use of the IJMS' copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org
Infringing material
If you become aware of any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org
