Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Medical Students' Perspectives on Balancing Innovation, Ethics, and Patient-Centered Care

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2025.3344

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, innovation, helthcare

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare delivery, offering unprecedented opportunities for enhanced diagnostics, efficiency, and patient care. However, this transformation also introduces pressing ethical challenges, particularly concerning autonomy, algorithmic bias, and data privacy. In this editorial, we explore these issues through the lens of medical students and future physicians, emphasizing the need for ethical vigilance and proactive governance in the deployment of AI technologies in clinical settings.

We argue that while AI can support autonomy by providing personalized insights, opaque “black box” models and lack of informed consent can undermine shared decision-making and trust. Algorithmic bias further threatens equity in care, as many AI systems are trained on unrepresentative datasets, leading to disparities in diagnosis and treatment. Additionally, concerns about data ownership, consent, and commercial use of patient information demand renewed attention to privacy and transparency.

Medical education must evolve to prepare future clinicians to engage with AI critically and ethically. This includes training in bias recognition, responsible use, patient-centered communication, and contextual awareness. The integration of AI into curricula should go beyond technical literacy, fostering a deep understanding of its limitations and social implications.

Finally, robust governance and regulatory oversight are essential. Institutions, policymakers, and international organizations must ensure that AI systems in healthcare align with principles of justice, beneficence, and respect for persons. AI must enhance, not replace, human judgment, and its adoption must be guided by continuous ethical reflection and patient-centered values.

By embracing transparency, equity, and collaboration, AI can be a powerful tool that strengthens the foundations of ethical medical practice.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Algorithmic bias in health care exacerbates social inequities—how to prevent it. Available from: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/algorithmic-bias-in-health-care/. Last updated March 12, 2021; cited March 21, 2025.

Gianfrancesco MA, Tamang S, Yazdany J, Schmajuk G. Potential biases in machine learning algorithms using electronic health record data. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(11):1544–7.

Accuray. Overcoming AI bias: Understanding, identifying, and mitigating algorithmic bias in healthcare. Available from: https://www.accuray.com/blog/overcoming-ai-bias. Last updated November 23, 2023; cited March 21, 2025.

Liu X, Cruz Rivera S, Moher D, Calvert MJ, Denniston AK. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension. BMJ. 2020;370:m3164.

Stetler C. AI algorithms used in healthcare can perpetuate bias. Rutgers University–Newark News. Available from: https://www.newark.rutgers.edu/news/ai-algorithms-used-healthcare-can-perpetuate-bias. Last updated November 14, 2024; cited March 21, 2025

Norval C, Janssen H, Cobbe J, Singh J. Data protection and tech startups: The need for attention, support, and scrutiny. Policy&Internet. 2021 Jun;13(2):278-99.

Quach S, Thaichon P, Martin KD, Weaven S, Palmatier RW. Digital technologies: tensions in privacy and data. J of the Acad Mark Sci. 2022;50(6):1299-323.

Khan FA. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. J Islam Med Assoc. 2011 Aug 10;43(2):93-94.

Jordan B. The legacy of Henrietta Lacks. Med Sci. 2021;37(12):1189-93.

HeLa Cases Prompt More Thinking on Ethics. Cancer Discov. 2023; 13(10):2112-3.

National Institutes of Health. Significant Research Advances Enabled by HeLa Cells [Internet]. Office of Science Policy. National Institutes of Health; 2022.

Klitzman R. Henrietta Lacks' family's lawsuits: ethical questions and solutions. Trends Biotechnol. 2022;40(7):769-72.

Baptiste DL, Caviness-Ashe N, Josiah N, Commodore-Mensah Y, Arscott J, Wilson PR, et al. Henrietta Lacks and America's dark history of research involving African Americans. Nurs Open. 2022;9(5):2236-8.

Temsah A, Alhasan K, Altamimi I, Jamal A, Al-Eyadhy A, Malki KH, et al. DeepSeek in Healthcare: Revealing Opportunities and Steering Challenges of a New Open-Source Artificial Intelligence Frontier. Cureus. 2025;17(2):e79221.

Murdoch, B. Privacy and artificial intelligence: challenges for protecting health information in a new era. BMC Med Ethics 22. 2021; 122.

Li J. Security Implications of AI Chatbots in Health Care. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e47551.

Fatehi F, Hassandoust F, Ko RKL, Akhlaghpour S. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Healthcare: Hot Topics and Research Fronts. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020;270:1118-22.

Mennella C, Maniscalco U, Pietro GD, Esposito M. Ethical and regulatory challenges of AI technologies in healthcare: A narrative review. Heliyon. 2024;10(4):e26297–7.

Heath S. Patient advocates explore a patient bill of rights for AI. Patient Engagement. TechTarget; 2024.

Bleiberg J, Niam Yaraghi. Your medical data: You don’t own it, but you can have it. Brookings. 2015.

Kathleen Liddell, David A Simon, Anneke Lucassen, Patient data ownership: who owns your health?, J Law Biosci. 2021.

Chiruvella V, Guddati AK. Ethical Issues in Patient Data Ownership. Interact J Med Res. 2021;10(2):e22269.

Liu Z, Zhang L, Wu Z, Yu X, Cao C, Dai H, et al. Surviving ChatGPT in healthcare. Front Radiol. 2023;3:1224682.

1.Kahn SD, Terry SF. Who owns (or controls) health data? Scientific Data [Internet]. 2024 Feb 1;11(1):156.

Price WN, Cohen IG. Privacy in the age of medical big data. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):37-43.

Hansen J, Carlin K, Hart A, Johnson J, Wells S, Kiel J. Updating HIPAA Security to Respond to Artificial Intelligence . J AHIMA. 2023.

Houser, Kimberly and Voss, W. Gregory, GDPR: The End of Google and Facebook or a New Paradigm in Data Privacy? (July 11, 2018). Working Paper, 25 Rich. J. L. & Tech. 1, 2018 Forthcoming,

The Light Collective. Patient AI Rights Initiative. Available from: https://lightcollective.org/patient-ai-rights/. Last updated 2024: cited Mar 10, 2025.

Hindelang M, Sitaru S, Zink A. Transforming Health Care Through Chatbots for Medical History-Taking and Future Directions: Comprehensive Systematic Review. JMIR Med Inform. 2024 ;12:e56628.

Okonkwo CW, Ade-Ibijola A. Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2021;2(2):100033.

Alkhaaldi SMI, Kassab CH, Dimassi Z, Alsoud LO, Fahim MA, Hageh CA, et al. Medical Student Experiences and Perceptions of ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Med Educ. 2023; 9(1):e51302.

Abdelhafiz AS, Farghly MI, Sultan EA, Moaz Elsayed Abouelmagd, Youssef Ashmawy, Eman Hany Elsebaie. Medical students and ChatGPT: analyzing attitudes, practices, and academic perceptions. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25(1)

Liu M, Okuhara T, Chang X, Ritsuko Shirabe, Nishiie Y, Okada H, et al. Performance of ChatGPT Across Different Versions in Medical Licensing Examinations Worldwide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Medl Internet Res. 2024; 26:e60807–7.

Brin D, Sorin V, Vaid A, Soroush A, Glicksberg BS, Charney A, et al. Comparing ChatGPT and GPT-4 performance in USMLE soft skill assessments. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1).

Alowais SA, Alghamdi SS, Alsuhebany N, Alqahtani T, Alshaya A, Almohareb SN, et al. Revolutionizing Healthcare: The Role Of Artificial Intelligence In Clinical Practice. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1).

Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, et al. Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient Outcomes. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1223.

Owoyemi A, Owoyemi J, Osiyemi A, Boyd A. Artificial Intelligence for Healthcare in Africa. Front Digit Health. 2020;2.

Gore MN, Olawade DB. Harnessing AI for public health: India's roadmap. Front Public Health. 2024;12.

Soellner M, Koenigstorfer J. Compliance with medical recommendations depending on the use of artificial intelligence as a diagnostic method. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021;21(1).

Esmaeilzadeh P, Mirzaei T, Dharanikota S. Patients' Perceptions Toward Human–Artificial Intelligence Interaction in Health Care: Experimental Study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(11)

Kolb D. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc; 2015.

Biagini G. Towards an AI-Literate Future: A Systematic Literature Review Exploring Education, Ethics, and Applications. Int J Artif Intell Educ. 2025.

Norori N, Hu Q, Aellen FM, Faraci FD, Tzovara A. Addressing bias in big data and AI for health care: A call for open science. Patterns. 2021;2(10):100347.

Tikhomirov L, Semmler C, McCradden M, Searston R, Ghassemi M, Oakden-Rayner L. Medical artificial intelligence for clinicians: the lost cognitive perspective. Lancet Digit Health. 2024;6(8)

Elendu C, Amaechi DC, Elendu TC, Jingwa KA, Okoye OK, John Okah M, et al. Ethical implications of AI and robotics in healthcare: A review. Medicine. 2023;102(50):e36671.

Mittermaier M, Raza MM, Kvedar JC. Bias in AI-based models for medical applications: challenges and mitigation strategies. npj Digit Med. 2023;6(1):113, s41746-023-00858-z.

Adwer L, Whiting E. Exploring Artificial Intelligence Solutions and Challenges in Healthcare Administration. In: 2024 IEEE 12th International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI). 2024. p. 528–30.

Panch T, Mattie H, Atun R. Artificial intelligence and algorithmic bias: implications for health systems. J Glob Health. 2019;9(2):010318.

Jeyaraman M, Balaji S, Jeyaraman N, Yadav S. Unraveling the Ethical Enigma: Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e43262.

Palaniappan K, Lin EYT, Vogel S. Global Regulatory Frameworks for the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Healthcare Services Sector. Healthc. 2024;12(5):562.

Alderden JG, Johnny JD. Artificial Intelligence and the Critical Care Nurse. Crit Care Nurs. 2023;43(5):7–8.

Zhang S, Yu J, Xu X, Yin C, Lu Y, Yao B, et al. Rethinking Human-AI Collaboration in Complex Medical Decision Making: A Case Study in Sepsis Diagnosis. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2024. p. 1–18.

Rajkomar A, Hardt M, Howell MD, Corrado G, Chin MH. Ensuring Fairness in Machine Learning to Advance Health Equity. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(12):866–72.

Civaner MM, Uncu Y, Bulut F, Chalil EG, Tatli A. Artificial intelligence in medical education: a cross-sectional needs assessment. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):772.

Çalışkan SA, Demir K, Karaca O. Artificial intelligence in medical education curriculum: An e-Delphi study for competencies. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(7):e0271872.

Katznelson G, Gerke S. The need for health AI ethics in medical school education. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2021;26(4):1447–58.

Morrell W, Shachar C, Weiss AP. The oversight of autonomous artificial intelligence: lessons from nurse practitioners as physician extenders. J Law Biosci. 2022;9(2):lsac021.

Meskó B, Topol EJ. The imperative for regulatory oversight of large language models (or generative AI) in healthcare. NPJ Digit Med. 2023; 6(1):120.

Patel J, Shah K, Jain J, Shah V. Cross Sectional Study on Adherence to Medication among Patients with Hypertension and/or Diabetes Attending One of the Tertiary Care Institutes of Ahmedabad City, Gujarat, India. Int J Med Stud. 2025 Jan-Mar;13(1):47-51.

Hamad H. Am I A Fraud? Occurrence and Factors Associated with Impostor Phenomenon among Medical Students of Khartoum University, 2022. Int J Med Stud. 2025 Jan-Mar;13(1):17-24.

Rowe M, Tahmo N, Oyewole O, King K, Cochran T, Saksena Y, et al. Let’s Talk about Bias in Healthcare: Experiences from an Interactive Interprofessional Student Seminar. Int J Med Stud. 2025 Jan-Mar;13(1):25-39.

McGuire B, Mahfouz H, Lorenz H, Archer E. Sport and Exercise Medicine: a Misunderstood Specialty Among Medical Students and Foundation Doctors. Int J Med Stud. 2025 Jan-Mar;13(1):40-46.

Deng A, Kaneria P, Espiridion E. Psychiatric Outcomes in Patients with Trigeminal Neuralgia Treated with Anticonvulsants and Antidepressants: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a National Database. Int J Med Stud. 2025 Jan-Mar;13(1):52-59.

Sawaya J, McRae J, Mladenov G, Radulescu A. Pediatric Hepatoblastoma: A Single-Institution Case Series. Int J Med Stud. 2025 Jan-Mar;13(1):60-66.

Granberry R, Mathesh V, Ford L, Thompson W, Loria H, Pak T. Development and Evaluation of a Pilot Short-Term Mental Health Curriculum with Longitudinal Evaluation for Minority Youth. Int J Med Stud. 2025 Jan-Mar;13(1):67-72.

Lagunes A, Méndez L, Ortiz-F. Academic Burnout in Mexican Medical Students: A Critical Review of Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Gaps in Intervention. Int J Med Stud. 2025 Jan-Mar;13(1):73-86

Hmaideh A, Haji B, Orabi F, Almostaffa O, Rashwany Q, Zakaria W. Hydatid Cyst Complicated by Dilated Bile Duct Treated with Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A Case Report. Int J Med Stud. 2025 Jan-Mar;13(1):87-93

Poh D, Andrews S, Andrady U. Public Health Longitudinal Integrated Foundation Training (LIFT) program: A Junior Doctor’s Experience. Int J Med Stud. 2025 Jan-Mar;13(1):94-96.

Zaheer A. Combating Rheumatic Heart Disease in Pakistan: An Experience of Training, Screening and Community Outreach. Int J Med Stud. 2025 Jan-Mar;13(1):100-102.

Padashetty C, Hegde S. The Measure of Success – A Day in the Life of a Pediatric Surgeon. Int J Med Stud. 2025 Jan-Mar;13(1):103-104.

Louca M, Gonski P. The Pupil’s P’s: An Alliterative Tool and Practical Framework for Managing Older Patients. Int J Med Stud. 2025 Jan-Mar;13(1):105-109.

Diagram comparing two data ownership models for medical test results. The left panel illustrates hospital ownership with patient consent, where the hospital manages and shares data with tech companies after obtaining consent. The right panel depicts joint patient-hospital ownership, emphasizing shared control of data between patients and hospitals, with increased patient autonomy and the ability to withdraw consent

Downloads

Published

2025-03-31

How to Cite

Roy, E., Malafa, S., Adwer, L. M., Tabache, H., Sheth, T., Mishra, V., Abouelmagd, M. E., Cushieri, A., Ahmed Khan, S., Gaman, M.-A., Puyana, J. C., & Bonilla-Escobar, F. J. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Medical Students’ Perspectives on Balancing Innovation, Ethics, and Patient-Centered Care. International Journal of Medical Students, 13(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2025.3344

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>