A Literature Review of Possible Barriers and Knowledge Gaps of General Practitioners in Implementing Advance Care Planning in Ireland: Experience from Other Countries

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2021.567

Keywords:

General Practitioners, General practice, Advance care planning, Advance care, End of life care, Terminal care

Abstract

Background: An Advance Care Plan (ACP) is a decision-making process concerning end-of-life care that embodies a patient’s values and preferences, for a time when patients are unable to make such choices on their own. ACPs have been employed into medical practices worldwide; however, they remain largely uncompleted by general practitioners (GPs), regardless of their benefits to patients and their families with respect to end of life (EOL) care. Furthermore, ACPs will soon be implemented into clinician practices across Ireland, as part of the Assisted Decision Making (Capacity) Act 2015. This review aims to explore the literature to examine challenges GPs may face in employing ACPs into clinical practice.

Methods: An electronic search was performed through three databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, and CINAHL Plus, through which a total of eleven studies met the selection criteria. Additionally, three studies were provided by experts in the field. Thus, a total of fourteen studies were condensed and critically appraised through CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Program), which concluded that the quality of the studies was high.

Conclusion: Through this review, knowledge gaps and barriers for GPs regarding ACPs were identified. Barriers for implementing ACPs into practice were categorized into three major themes: barriers for the GPs, barriers in the healthcare system, and barriers regarding the patient. These included insufficient time, complexity of the ACP documents themselves, uncertainty of the disease prognosis, and the ultimate fear of inducing anxiety and loss of hope in patients.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Brazil K, Carter G, Galway K, Watson M, T van der Steen J. General practitioners perceptions on advance care planning for patients living with dementia. BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Apr 23;14(14).

Fletcher S, Sinclair C, Rhee J, Goh D, Auret K. Rural health professionals‘ experiences in implementing advance care planning: a focus group study. Aust J of Prim Health. 2016 Nov;22:423-7.

Fan E, Rhee J. A self-reported survey on the confidence levels and motivation of New South Wales practice nurses on conducting advance-care planning (ACP) initiatives in the general-practice setting. Aust J of Prim Health. 2017 Apr;23:80-6.

Dingfield L, Kayser J. Integrating Advance Care Planning Into Practice. Chest. 2017 Mar 6;151(6):1387-1393.

Sabatino C. The Evolution of Health Care Advance Planning Law and Policy. Milbank Q. 2010 Jun;88(2):211-39.

Meeussen K, Van den Block L, Echteld M, Bossuyt N, Bilsen J, Van Casteren V et al. Advance Care Planning in Belgium and The Netherlands: A Nationwide Retrospective Study Via Sentinel Networks of General Practitioners. J Pain and Symptom Manage. 2011 Oct;42(4):565-77.

Detering K, Hancock A, Reade M, Silvester W. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010 March 24;340:c1345.

Ries NM, Douglas M, Simon J, Fassbender K. Doctors, Lawyers and Advance Care Planning: Time for Innovation to Work Together to Meet Client Needs. Médecins, avocats et planification préalable de soins: innover et travailler ensemble pour satisfaire les besoins du client. Health Policy. 2016 Nov;12(2):12-8. French.

Mullick A, Martin J, Sallnow L. An Introduction to Advance Care Planning in Practice. BMJ. 2013 Oct 21;347:f6064.

Busa C, Zeller J, Csikós Á. [Who should decide at the end of life? International practice of advance care planning and possibilities for adaptation in Hungary]. Orv Hetil. 2018 Jan;159(4):131-40.

De Vleminck A, Houttekier D, Deliens L, Vander Stichele R, Pardon K. Development of a complex intervention to support the initiation of advance care planning by general practitioners in patients at risk of deteriorating or dying: a phase 0-1 study. BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Feb;15(17).

Lam L, Ansari AS, Baquir PJ, Chowdhury N, Tran K, Bailey J. Current practices, barriers and enablers for advance care planning among healthcare workers of aged care facilities in western New South Wales, Australia. Rural and Remote Health. 2018 Nov;18:4714.

De Vleminck A, Pardon K, Beernaert K, Deschepper R, Houttekier D, Van Audenhove C et al. Barriers to Advance Care Planning in Cancer, Heart Failure and Dementia Patients: A Focus Group Study on General Practitioners' Views and Experiences. PLOS ONE. 2014 Jan 21;9(1):e84905.

Boyd K, Mason B, Kendall M, Barclay S, Chinn D, Thomas K et al. Advance care planning for cancer patients in primary care: a feasibility study. Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Dec;60(581):e449-e458.

Cartwright, CM, Parker, MH. Advance care planning and end of life decision making. Aust Fam Physician. 2004 Oct;33(10):815-9.

De Vleminck A, Houttekier D, Pardon K, Deschepper R, Van Audenhove C, Vander Stichele R et al. Barriers and facilitators for general practitioners to engage in advance care planning: A systematic review. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013 Dec;31(4):215-26.

Hajizadeh N, Uhler L, Pérez Figueroa R. Understanding patients' and doctors' attitudes about shared decision making for advance care planning. Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2054-65.

Weafer J, Murphy S, Foley S. IHF Perspectives 4 A Perspective on Advance Planning for end-of-life. Dublin; 2016 March.

Detering K, Hancock A, Reade M, Silvester W. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c1345-c1345.

Minto F, Strickland K. Anticipating emotion: a qualitative study of advance care planning in the community setting. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2011 Jun;17(6):278-284.

Singer P, Martin D, Kelner M. Quality End-of-Life Care. JAMA. 1999 Jan 23;281(2):163.

Rhee J, Zwar N, Kemp L. Why Are Advance Care Planning Decisions Not Implemented? Insights from Interviews with Australian General Practitioners. J Palliat Med. 2013 Oct;16(10):1197-204.

Howard M, Bernard C, Klein D, Tan A, Slaven M, Barwich D et al. Barriers and Enablers to Advance Care Planning with Patients in Primary Care: A Survey of Health Care Providers. Can Fam Physician. 2018 Apr;64:e190-e198.

Scholten G, Bourguignon S, Delanote A, Vermeulen B, Van Boxem G, Schoenmakers B. Advance directive: does the GP know and address what the patient wants? Advance directive in primary care. BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jun 11;19(58).

Downloads

Published

2021-06-22

How to Cite

Somal, K., & Foley, T. (2021). A Literature Review of Possible Barriers and Knowledge Gaps of General Practitioners in Implementing Advance Care Planning in Ireland: Experience from Other Countries. International Journal of Medical Students, 9(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2021.567

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021)

Section

Review

Categories

License

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site; with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
    2. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
    4. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
    5. The Author represents and warrants that:
      1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
      2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
      3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
      4. the Work has not previously been published;
      5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
      6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
    6. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from the Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Enforcement of copyright

The IJMS takes the protection of copyright very seriously.

If the IJMS discovers that you have used its copyright materials in contravention of the license above, the IJMS may bring legal proceedings against you seeking reparation and an injunction to stop you using those materials. You could also be ordered to pay legal costs.

If you become aware of any use of the IJMS' copyright materials that contravenes or may contravene the license above, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org

 

Infringing material

If you become aware of any material on the website that you believe infringes your or any other person's copyright, please report this by email to contact@ijms.org